Enhanced Risk Aversion, But Not Loss Aversion, in Unmedicated Pathological Anxiety

被引:119
作者
Charpentier, Caroline J. [1 ,2 ]
Aylward, Jessica [1 ]
Roiser, Jonathan P. [1 ]
Robinson, Oliver J. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Cognit Neurosci, London, England
[2] UCL, Dept Expt Psychol, Affect Brain Lab, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Anxiety; Decision making; Emotion; Loss aversion; Memory; Risk aversion; DECISION-MAKING; EXPOSURE THERAPY; ATTENTIONAL BIAS; PROSPECT-THEORY; TRAIT ANXIETY; ACUTE STRESS; DISORDERS; AMYGDALA; UNCERTAINTY; AVOIDANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.12.010
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Anxiety disorders are associated with disruptions in both emotional processing and decision making. As a result, anxious individuals often make decisions that favor harm avoidance. However, this bias could be driven by enhanced aversion to uncertainty about the decision outcome (e.g., risk) or aversion to negative outcomes (e.g., loss). Distinguishing between these possibilities may provide a better cognitive understanding of anxiety disorders and hence inform treatment strategies. METHODS: To address this question, unmedicated individuals with pathological anxiety (n = 25) and matched healthy control subjects (n = 23) completed a gambling task featuring a decision between a gamble and a safe (certain) option on every trial. Choices on one type of gamble-involving weighing a potential win against a potential loss (mixed)-could be driven by both loss and risk aversion, whereas choices on the other type-featuring only wins (gain only)-were exclusively driven by risk aversion. By fitting a computational prospect theory model to participants' choices, we were able to reliably estimate risk and loss aversion and their respective contribution to gambling decisions. RESULTS: Relative to healthy control subjects, pathologically anxious participants exhibited enhanced risk aversion but equivalent levels of loss aversion. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with pathological anxiety demonstrate clear avoidance biases in their decision making. These findings suggest that this may be driven by a reduced propensity to take risks rather than a stronger aversion to losses. This important clarification suggests that psychological interventions for anxiety should focus on reducing risk sensitivity rather than reducing sensitivity to negative outcomes per se.
引用
收藏
页码:1014 / 1022
页数:9
相关论文
共 66 条
[51]  
Robichaud M., 2013, CBT for Anxiety Disorders: A Practitioner Book, P57, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118330043.CH3
[52]   The impact of threat of shock on the framing effect and temporal discounting: executive functions unperturbed by acute stress? [J].
Robinson, Oliver J. ;
Bond, Rebecca L. ;
Roiser, Jonathan P. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
[53]   The impact of stress on financial decision-making varies as a function of depression and anxiety symptoms [J].
Robinson, Oliver J. ;
Bond, Rebecca L. ;
Roiser, Jonathan P. .
PEERJ, 2015, 3
[54]   The dorsal medial prefrontal (anterior cingulate) cortex-amygdala aversive amplification circuit in unmedicated generalised and social anxiety disorders: an observational study [J].
Robinson, Oliver J. ;
Krimsky, Marissa ;
Lieberman, Lynne ;
Allen, Phillip ;
Vytal, Katherine ;
Grillon, Christian .
LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 1 (04) :294-302
[55]   The impact of anxiety upon cognition: perspectives from human threat of shock studies [J].
Robinson, Oliver J. ;
Vytal, Katherine ;
Cornwell, Brian R. ;
Grillon, Christian .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
[56]   Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs [J].
Rouder, Jeffrey N. ;
Morey, Richard D. ;
Speckman, Paul L. ;
Province, Jordan M. .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 56 (05) :356-374
[57]   Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis [J].
Rouder, Jeffrey N. ;
Speckman, Paul L. ;
Sun, Dongchu ;
Morey, Richard D. ;
Iverson, Geoffrey .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2009, 16 (02) :225-237
[58]   ESTIMATING DIMENSION OF A MODEL [J].
SCHWARZ, G .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1978, 6 (02) :461-464
[59]   Reliability and Validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID) [J].
Sheehan, David V. ;
Sheehan, Kathy H. ;
Shytle, R. Douglas ;
Janavs, Juris ;
Bannon, Yvonne ;
Rogers, Jamison E. ;
Milo, Karen M. ;
Stock, Saundra L. ;
Wilkinson, Berney .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 71 (03) :313-326
[60]   Stress and Risky Decision Making: Cognitive Reflection, Emotional Learning or Both. [J].
Simonovic, Boban ;
Stupple, Edward J. N. ;
Gale, Maggie ;
Sheffield, David .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2017, 30 (02) :658-665