A modular framework for early-phase seamless oncology trials

被引:3
作者
Boonstra, Philip S. [1 ]
Braun, Thomas M. [1 ]
Chase, Elizabeth C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, 1415 Washington Hts, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Phase I; phase II; dose escalation; recommended phase II dose; CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD; CLINICAL-TRIALS; ADAPTIVE RANDOMIZATION; TOXICITY; EFFICACY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1177/1740774520981939
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: As our understanding of the etiology and mechanisms of cancer becomes more sophisticated and the number of therapeutic options increases, phase I oncology trials today have multiple primary objectives. Many such designs are now "seamless," meaning that the trial estimates both the maximum tolerated dose and the efficacy at this dose level. Sponsors often proceed with further study only with this additional efficacy evidence. However, with this increasing complexity in trial design, it becomes challenging to articulate fundamental operating characteristics of these trials, such as (1) what is the probability that the design will identify an acceptable, that is., safe and efficacious, dose level? or (2) how many patients will be assigned to an acceptable dose level on average? Methods: In this manuscript, we propose a new modular framework for designing and evaluating seamless oncology trials. Each module is comprised of either a dose assignment step or a dose-response evaluation, and multiple such modules can be implemented sequentially. We develop modules from existing phase I/II designs as well as a novel module for evaluating dose-response using a Bayesian isotonic regression scheme. Results: We also demonstrate a freely available R package called seamlesssim to numerically estimate, by means of simulation, the operating characteristics of these modular trials. Conclusions: Together, this design framework and its accompanying simulator allow the clinical trialist to compare multiple different candidate designs, more rigorously assess performance, better justify sample sizes, and ultimately select a higher quality design.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 313
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Sample size tables for exact single-stage phase II designs [J].
A'Hern, RP .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2001, 20 (06) :859-866
[2]  
Barlow RE., 1972, STAT INFERENCE ORDER
[3]  
Boonstra, 2020, SEAMLESSSIM SIMULATE
[4]   Statistical controversies in clinical research: building the bridge to phase II-efficacy estimation in dose-expansion cohorts [J].
Boonstra, P. S. ;
Braun, T. M. ;
Taylor, J. M. G. ;
Kidwell, K. M. ;
Bellile, E. L. ;
Daignault, S. ;
Zhao, L. ;
Griffith, K. A. ;
Lawrence, T. S. ;
Kalemkerian, G. P. ;
Schipper, M. J. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28 (07) :1427-1435
[5]   A Statistical Evaluation of Dose Expansion Cohorts in Phase I Clinical Trials [J].
Boonstra, Philip S. ;
Shen, Jincheng ;
Taylor, Jeremy M. G. ;
Braun, Thomas M. ;
Griffith, Kent A. ;
Daignault, Stephanie ;
Kalemkerian, Gregory P. ;
Lawrence, Theodore S. ;
Schipper, Matthew J. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2015, 107 (03)
[6]   The bivariate continual reassessment method: extending the CRM to phase I trials of two competing outcomes [J].
Braun, TA .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2002, 23 (03) :240-256
[7]  
Chase, 2020, SIMULATION STUDY INS
[8]   Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials with late-onset toxicities [J].
Cheung, YK ;
Chappell, R .
BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (04) :1177-1182
[9]   FLAG-IDA and Ponatinib in Patients with Blast Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia: Results from the Phase I/II UK Trials Acceleration Programme Matchpoint Trial [J].
Copland, Mhairi ;
Slade, Daniel ;
Byrne, Jenny ;
Brock, Kristian ;
De Lavallade, Hugues ;
Craddock, Charles ;
Clark, Richard ;
Smith, Matthew ;
Bishop, Rebecca ;
Milojkovic, Dragana ;
Yap, Christina .
BLOOD, 2019, 134
[10]   Adaptive designs for dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity response [J].
Dragalin, V ;
Fedorov, V .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2006, 136 (06) :1800-1823