Impact of COVID-19-related care disruptions on cervical cancer screening in the United States

被引:30
作者
Burger, Emily A. [1 ,2 ]
Jansen, Erik E. L. [3 ]
Killen, James [4 ]
de Kok, Inge M. C. M. [3 ]
Smith, Megan A. [4 ,5 ]
Sy, Stephen [1 ]
Dunnewind, Niels [3 ]
Campos, Nicole [1 ]
Haas, Jennifer S. [6 ]
Kobrin, Sarah [7 ]
Kamineni, Aruna [8 ]
Canfell, Karen [4 ,5 ]
Kim, Jane J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, 718 Huntington Ave,2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Oslo, Dept Hlth Management & Hlth Econ, Oslo, Norway
[3] Erasmus MC, Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Canc Council NSW, Canc Res Div, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[7] NCI, Div Canc Control & Populat Sci, Rockville, MD USA
[8] Kaiser Permanente, Washington Hlth Res Inst, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
COVID-19; cervical cancer screening; simulation modeling; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1177/09691413211001097
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: To quantify the secondary impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic disruptions to cervical cancer screening in the United States, stratified by step in the screening process and primary test modality, on cervical cancer burden. Methods: We conducted a comparative model-based analysis using three independent NCI Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network cervical models to quantify the impact of eight alternative COVID-19-related screening disruption scenarios compared to a scenario of no disruptions. Scenarios varied by the duration of the disruption (6 or 24 months), steps in the screening process being disrupted (primary screening, surveillance, colposcopy, excisional treatment), and primary screening modality (cytology alone or cytology plus human papillomavirus "cotesting"). Results: The models consistently showed that COVID-19-related disruptions yield small net increases in cervical cancer cases by 2027, which are greater for women previously screened with cytology compared with cotesting. When disruptions affected all four steps in the screening process under cytology-based screening, there were an additional 5-7 and 38-45 cases per one million screened for 6- and 24-month disruptions, respectively. In contrast, under cotesting, there were additional 4-5 and 35-45 cases per one million screened for 6- and 24-month disruptions, respectively. The majority (58-79%) of the projected increases in cases under cotesting were due to disruptions to surveillance, colposcopies, or excisional treatment, rather than to primary screening. Conclusions: Women in need of surveillance, colposcopies, or excisional treatment, or whose last primary screen did not involve human papillomavirus testing, may comprise priority groups for reintroductions.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 216
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
American Cancer Society, Key statistics for cervical cancer
[2]  
[Anonymous], WORLD POPULATION PRO
[3]   Projected time to elimination of cervical cancer in the USA: a comparative modelling study [J].
Burger, Emily A. ;
Smith, Megan A. ;
Killen, James ;
Sy, Stephen ;
Simms, Kate T. ;
Canfell, Karen ;
Kim, Jane J. .
LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 5 (04) :E213-E222
[4]   Estimating the Natural History of Cervical Carcinogenesis Using Simulation Models: A CISNET Comparative Analysis [J].
Burger, Emily A. ;
de Kok, Inge M. C. M. ;
Groene, Emily ;
Killen, James ;
Canfell, Karen ;
Kulasingam, Shalini ;
Kuntz, Karen M. ;
Matthijsse, Suzette ;
Regan, Catherine ;
Simms, Kate T. ;
Smith, Megan A. ;
Sy, Stephen ;
Alarid-Escudero, Fernando ;
Vaidyanathan, Vivek ;
van Ballegooijen, Marjolein ;
Kim, Jane J. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2020, 112 (09) :955-963
[5]  
Curry SJ., 2018, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V320
[6]  
Mast Christopher, 2020, Delayed Cancer Screenings-A Second Look
[7]  
Miller MJ, 2021, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V70, P109, DOI [10.15585/mmwr.mm7004a1, 10.15585/mmwr.mm7004a1externalicon]
[8]   Adherence patterns to extended cervical screening intervals in women undergoing human papillomavirus (HPV) and cytology cotesting [J].
Rendle, Katharine A. ;
Schiffman, Mark ;
Cheung, Li C. ;
Kinney, Walter K. ;
Fetterman, Barbara ;
Poitras, Nancy E. ;
Lorey, Thomas ;
Castle, Philip E. .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 109 :44-50
[9]   Human Papillomavirus Testing in the Prevention of Cervical Cancer [J].
Schiffman, Mark ;
Wentzensen, Nicolas ;
Wacholder, Sholom ;
Kinney, Walter ;
Gage, Julia C. ;
Castle, Philip E. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (05) :368-383
[10]   COVID-19 and cancer [J].
Sharpless, Norman E. .
SCIENCE, 2020, 368 (6497) :1290-+