Comparison between conventional cystometry and stimulated filling cystometry by diuretics in a neurogenic bladder after spinal cord injury

Objective: To determine in the neurogenic bladder whether cystometry performed under near physiologic condition by filling stimulation using diuretics reveals different findings compared with conventional cystometry (CMG). Design: One group of subjects from a university teaching hospital was tested in two conditions. The maximum detrusor pressure (MPdet) and compliance of the bladder in CMG and furosemide-stimulated filling cystometry (FCMG) were compared in 27 patients with neurogenic bladder after spinal cord injury. The MPdet was estimated. Compliance was calculated. For CMG, the bladder was filled. FCMG was performed 3 hr after CMG. For FCMG, furosemide was injected after infusion of normal saline. Recording intravesical pressure started after emptying the bladder immediately after furosemide injection. Results: Significant differences were found between CMG and FCMG in hyperreflexic neurogenic bladders with respect to a decrease in MPdet and increase in compliance with FCMG. However, there were no significant differences in MPdet and compliance in hyporeflexic or areflexic neurogenic bladders between the two techniques. Conclusion: We have found that FCMG is useful in evaluating both genuine MPdet and compliance in patients with hyperreflexic neurogenic bladder dysfunction. FCMG provides more reliable information on detrusor characteristics than CMG in hyperreflexic neurogenic bladder. We suggest that FCMG is an alternative, effective, and near physiologic diagnostic method, having short assessment time for improving evaluation of the detrusor characteristics of hyperreflexic neurogenic bladder.