Exploring the connection between transdisciplinary co-production and urban sustainability solutions: a case study at an urban stream management symposium

被引:7
作者
Bixler, R. Patrick [1 ]
Belaire, J. Amy [2 ]
Faust, Kasey M. [3 ]
Scoggins, Mateo [4 ]
Gonzalez, Ana [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, LBJ Sch Publ Affairs, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Nature Conservancy, Austin, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Cockrell Sch Engn, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] Watershed Protect Dept, Austin, TX USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Urban sustainability; Co-production; Transdisciplinary research; Community engagement; SCIENCE; TEAMWORK; POLICY;
D O I
10.1007/s11252-022-01226-7
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Urban sustainability challenges are complex, impacting a wide range of stakeholders. It is commonly accepted that sustainable solutions must integrate scientific knowledge from a variety of disciplines, coupled with community stakeholder ideas, norms, and practices in ways that link knowledge to decision-making and action. Jointly researching problems and co-designing solutions, known as co-production, requires working together in teams. Interestingly, the intersection of co-production and team science has been understudied. We address this gap by asking: Does team formation - specifically, single-, multi- or trans-disciplinary teams - impact the process and perceived efficacy of sustainability solutions? Using case study data collected at the 5th Symposium for Urbanization and Stream Ecology (SUSE5), held in February 2020, we explore the impact of bringing different types of teams together to generate solutions to real-world "wicked problems" surrounding urban streams in Austin, Texas. We found that the solutions generated by trans-disciplinary teams - i.e., teams that include multiple disciplines and community members - were on average rated higher by their peers than solutions from single- or multi-disciplinary teams. However, our findings suggest that some transdisciplinary teams found it difficult to get through the different stages of problem definition to solution design. The findings from this limited but novel and unique case study make two important contributions to the literature. First, co-production leads to more agreeable solutions to urban sustainability challenges. Second, co-production team dynamics are likely to be more complicated and variable than disciplinary or multidisciplinary teams. A better understanding of these opportunities and challenges can inform institutions and agencies employing a community-engaged process to solve urban sustainability challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:1207 / 1216
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] To co-produce or not to co-produce
    Lemos, Maria Carmen
    Arnott, James C.
    Ardoin, Nicole M.
    Baja, Kristin
    Bednarek, Angela T.
    Dewulf, Art
    Fieseler, Clare
    Goodrich, Kristen A.
    Jagannathan, Kripa
    Klenk, Nicole
    Mach, Katharine J.
    Meadow, Alison M.
    Meyer, Ryan
    Moss, Richard
    Nichols, Leah
    Sjostrom, K. Dana
    Stults, Missy
    Turnhout, Esther
    Vaughan, Catherine
    Wong-Parodi, Gabrielle
    Wyborn, Carina
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 1 (12): : 722 - 724
  • [22] RECOGNITION OF EXPERTISE IN DECISION-MAKING GROUPS - EFFECTS OF GROUP-SIZE AND PARTICIPATION PATTERNS
    LITTLEPAGE, GE
    SILBIGER, H
    [J]. SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 1992, 23 (03) : 344 - 355
  • [23] Wicked problems: a mapping review of the literature
    Lonngren, Johanna
    van Poeck, Katrien
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (06) : 481 - 502
  • [24] Co-production in global sustainability: Histories and theories
    Miller, Clark A.
    Wyborn, Carina
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2020, 113 : 88 - 95
  • [25] Principles of scientific research team formation and evolution
    Milojevic, Stasa
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 (11) : 3984 - 3989
  • [26] Transfer as a reciprocal process: How to foster receptivity to results of transdisciplinary research
    Nagy, Emilia
    Ransiek, Anna
    Schaefer, Martina
    Lux, Alexandra
    Bergmann, Matthias
    Jahn, Thomas
    Marg, Oskar
    Theiler, Lena
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2020, 104 : 148 - 160
  • [27] Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work
    Nancarrow, Susan A.
    Booth, Andrew
    Ariss, Steven
    Smith, Tony
    Enderby, Pam
    Roots, Alison
    [J]. HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH, 2013, 11
  • [28] Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research
    Norstrom, Albert, V
    Cvitanovic, Christopher
    Lof, Marie F.
    West, Simon
    Wyborn, Carina
    Balvanera, Patricia
    Bednarek, Angela T.
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Biggs, Reinette
    de Bremond, Ariane
    Campbell, Bruce M.
    Canadell, Josep G.
    Carpenter, Stephen R.
    Folke, Carl
    Fulton, Elizabeth A.
    Gaffney, Owen
    Gelcich, Stefan
    Jouffray, Jean-Baptiste
    Leach, Melissa
    Le Tissier, Martin
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    Louder, Elena
    Loutre, Marie-France
    Meadow, Alison M.
    Nagendra, Harini
    Payne, Davnah
    Peterson, Garry D.
    Reyers, Belinda
    Scholes, Robert
    Speranza, Chinwe Ifejika
    Spierenburg, Marja
    Stafford-Smith, Mark
    Tengo, Maria
    van der Hel, Sandra
    van Putten, Ingrid
    Osterblom, Henrik
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 3 (03) : 182 - 190
  • [29] Pohl C., 2007, Principles for Designing Transdisciplinary Research
  • [30] From science to policy through transdisciplinary research
    Pohl, Christian
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2008, 11 (01) : 46 - 53