Exploring the connection between transdisciplinary co-production and urban sustainability solutions: a case study at an urban stream management symposium

被引:7
作者
Bixler, R. Patrick [1 ]
Belaire, J. Amy [2 ]
Faust, Kasey M. [3 ]
Scoggins, Mateo [4 ]
Gonzalez, Ana [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, LBJ Sch Publ Affairs, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Nature Conservancy, Austin, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Cockrell Sch Engn, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] Watershed Protect Dept, Austin, TX USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Urban sustainability; Co-production; Transdisciplinary research; Community engagement; SCIENCE; TEAMWORK; POLICY;
D O I
10.1007/s11252-022-01226-7
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Urban sustainability challenges are complex, impacting a wide range of stakeholders. It is commonly accepted that sustainable solutions must integrate scientific knowledge from a variety of disciplines, coupled with community stakeholder ideas, norms, and practices in ways that link knowledge to decision-making and action. Jointly researching problems and co-designing solutions, known as co-production, requires working together in teams. Interestingly, the intersection of co-production and team science has been understudied. We address this gap by asking: Does team formation - specifically, single-, multi- or trans-disciplinary teams - impact the process and perceived efficacy of sustainability solutions? Using case study data collected at the 5th Symposium for Urbanization and Stream Ecology (SUSE5), held in February 2020, we explore the impact of bringing different types of teams together to generate solutions to real-world "wicked problems" surrounding urban streams in Austin, Texas. We found that the solutions generated by trans-disciplinary teams - i.e., teams that include multiple disciplines and community members - were on average rated higher by their peers than solutions from single- or multi-disciplinary teams. However, our findings suggest that some transdisciplinary teams found it difficult to get through the different stages of problem definition to solution design. The findings from this limited but novel and unique case study make two important contributions to the literature. First, co-production leads to more agreeable solutions to urban sustainability challenges. Second, co-production team dynamics are likely to be more complicated and variable than disciplinary or multidisciplinary teams. A better understanding of these opportunities and challenges can inform institutions and agencies employing a community-engaged process to solve urban sustainability challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:1207 / 1216
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, Tackling Wicked Problems Through the Transdisciplinary Imagination
  • [2] Arsham H., 2011, INT ENCY STAT SCI, P252
  • [3] Bai X., 2018, The Urban Planet: Knowledge Towards Sustainable Cities, P462
  • [4] Six research priorities for cities and climate change
    Bai, Xuemei
    Dawson, Richard J.
    Urge-Vorsatz, Diana
    Delgado, Gian C.
    Barau, Aliyu Salisu
    Dhakal, Shobhakar
    Dodman, David
    Leonardsen, Lykke
    Masson-Delmotte, Valerie
    Roberts, Debra
    Schultz, Seth
    [J]. NATURE, 2018, 555 (7694) : 19 - 21
  • [5] Defining and advancing a systems approach for sustainable cities
    Bai, Xuemei
    Surveyer, Alyson
    Elmqvist, Thomas
    Gatzweiler, Franz W.
    Guneralp, Burak
    Parnell, Susan
    Prieur-Richard, Anne-Helene
    Shrivastava, Paul
    Siri, Jose Gabriel
    Stafford-Smith, Mark
    Toussaint, Jean-Patrick
    Webb, Robert
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 23 : 69 - 78
  • [6] Linking transdisciplinary research characteristics and quality to effectiveness: A comparative analysis of five research-for-development projects
    Belcher, Brian M.
    Claus, Rachel
    Davel, Rachel
    Ramirez, Luisa F.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2019, 101 : 192 - 203
  • [7] Assessing integrated sustainability research: use of social network analysis to evaluate scientific integration and transdisciplinarity in research networks
    Bixler, R. Patrick
    Atshan, Samer
    Banner, Jay L.
    Tremaine, Darrel
    Mace, Robert E.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 39 : 103 - 113
  • [8] An Observatory Framework for Metropolitan Change: Understanding Urban Social-Ecological-Technical Systems in Texas and Beyond
    Bixler, R. Patrick
    Lieberknecht, Katherine
    Leite, Fernanda
    Felkner, Juliana
    Oden, Michael
    Richter, Steven M.
    Atshan, Samer
    Zilveti, Alvaro
    Thomas, Rachel
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (13)
  • [9] Getting From 'Me' to 'We': Role Clarity, Team Process, and the Transition From Individual Knowledge to Shared Mental Models in Employee Dyads
    Cassidy, Scott A.
    Stanley, David J.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L ADMINISTRATION, 2019, 36 (02): : 208 - 220
  • [10] Six modes of co-production for sustainability
    Chambers, Josephine M.
    Wyborn, Carina
    Ryan, Melanie E.
    Reid, Robin S.
    Riechers, Maraja
    Serban, Anca
    Bennett, Nathan J.
    Cvitanovic, Christopher
    Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E.
    Galvin, Kathleen A.
    Goldstein, Bruce E.
    Klenk, Nicole L.
    Tengo, Maria
    Brennan, Ruth
    Cockburn, Jessica J.
    Hill, Rosemary
    Munera, Claudia
    Nel, Jeanne L.
    Osterblom, Henrik
    Bednarek, Angela T.
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Brandeis, Amos
    Charli-Joseph, Lakshmi
    Chatterton, Paul
    Curran, K.
    Dumrongrojwatthana, Pongchai
    Duran, America Paz
    Fada, Salamatu J.
    Gerber, Jean-David
    Green, Jonathan M. H.
    Guerrero, Angela M.
    Haller, Tobias
    Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana
    Leimona, Beria
    Montana, Jasper
    Rondeau, Renee
    Spierenburg, Marja
    Steyaert, Patrick
    Zaehringer, Julie G.
    Gruby, Rebecca
    Hutton, Jon
    Pickering, Tomas
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 4 (11) : 983 - 996