Rectal spacer hydrogel in 1.5T MR-guided and daily adapted SBRT for prostate cancer: dosimetric analysis and preliminary patient-reported outcomes

被引:30
|
作者
Alongi, Filippo [1 ,2 ]
Rigo, Michele [1 ]
Figlia, Vanessa [1 ]
Cuccia, Francesco [1 ]
Giaj-Levra, Niccolo [1 ]
Nicosia, Luca [1 ]
Ricchetti, Francesco [1 ]
Vitale, Claudio [1 ]
Sicignano, Gianluisa [1 ]
De Simone, Antonio
Naccarato, Stefania
Ruggieri, Ruggero
Mazzola, Rosario
机构
[1] IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hosp, Canc Care Ctr, Adv Radiat Oncol Dept, Negrar, Italy
[2] Univ Brescia, Brescia, Italy
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2021年 / 94卷 / 1117期
关键词
RADIOTHERAPY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20200848
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: The main aim of the current analysis was to explore the hypothetical advantages using rectal spacer during 1.5T MR-guided and daily adapted prostate cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) compared to a no-rectal spacer hydrogel cohort of patients. Methods: The SBRT-protocol consisted of a 35Gy schedule delivered in 5 fractions. Herein, we present a dosimetric analysis between spacer and no-spacer patients. Furthermore, treatment tolerability and feasibility were preliminarily assessed according to clinicians-reported outcomes at the end of treatment and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) in both arms. Toxicity and quality of life were assessed at base-line and after treatment using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 5.0, International Prostatic Symptoms Score, ICIQ-SF, IIEF-5, and EORTC-QLQ-C30 and PR-25 questionnaires. Results: 120 plans (pre- and daily adaptive SBRT planning) were analyzed in 20 patients (10 patients in spacer group and 10 patients in no-spacer group) treated using 1.5T MR-guided adaptive SBRT. Statistically significant dosimetric advantages were observed in favor of the spacer insertion, improving the planning target volume coverage in terms of V33.2Gy >95% and planning target volume 37.5 Gy <2% mainly during daily-adapted SBRT. Also, rectum V32, V28 and V18Gy and bladder V35Gy <1 cc were significantly reduced in the spacer cohort. Concerning the PROMS, all questionnaires showed no difference between the pre- and post-SBRT evaluation in both arms, excepting the physical functioning item of EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire that was declined in the no-spacer group. Conclusion: These preliminary results strongly suggest the adoption of perirectal spacer due to dosimetric advantages not only for rectal sparing but also for target coverage. Longer follow-up is required to validate the clinical impact in terms of clinicians-reported toxicity and PROMs. Advances in knowledge: This the first experience reporting preliminary data concerning the potential dosimetric impact of rectal hydrogel spacer on MR-guided SBRT for prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] 1.5 T MR-guided and daily adapted SBRT for prostate cancer: feasibility, preliminary clinical tolerability, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes during treatment
    Alongi, Filippo
    Rigo, Michele
    Figlia, Vanessa
    Cuccia, Francesco
    Giaj-Levra, Niccolo
    Nicosia, Luca
    Ricchetti, Francesco
    Sicignano, Gianluisa
    De Simone, Antonio
    Naccarato, Stefania
    Ruggieri, Ruggero
    Mazzola, Rosario
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [2] Feasibility and safety of 1.5 T MR-guided and daily adapted abdominal-pelvic SBRT for elderly cancer patients: geriatric assessment tools and preliminary patient-reported outcomes
    Mazzola, Rosario
    Figlia, Vanessa
    Rigo, Michele
    Cuccia, Francesco
    Ricchetti, Francesco
    Giaj-Levra, Niccolo
    Nicosia, Luca
    Vitale, Claudio
    Sicignano, Gianluisa
    De Simone, Antonio
    Naccarato, Stefania
    Ruggieri, Ruggero
    Alongi, Filippo
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 146 (09) : 2379 - 2397
  • [3] 1.5 T MR-Guided Daily Adapted SBRT on Lymph Node Oligometastases from Prostate Cancer
    Nicosia, Luca
    Trapani, Giovanna
    Rigo, Michele
    Fiorini, Matilde
    Giaj-Levra, Niccolo
    Mazzola, Rosario
    Pastorello, Edoardo
    Ricchetti, Francesco
    Alongi, Filippo
    Cuccia, Francesco
    Figlia, Vanessa
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (22)
  • [4] Online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy for rectal cancer; feasibility of the workflow on a 1.5T MR-linac: clinical implementation and initial experience
    Intven, M. P. W.
    van Otterloo, S. R. de Mol
    Mook, S.
    Doornaert, P. A. H.
    de Groot-van Breugel, E. N.
    Sikkes, G. G.
    Willemsen-Bosman, M. E.
    van Zijp, H. M.
    Tijssen, R. H. N.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 154 : 172 - 178
  • [5] One-year clinical outcomes of MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy with rectal spacer for patients with localized prostate cancer
    Poon, Darren M. C.
    Yuan, Jing
    Wong, Oi Lei
    Yang, Bin
    Tse, Mei Yan
    Lau, Ka Ki
    Chiu, Sin Ting
    Chiu, Peter Ka-Fung
    Ng, Chi Fai
    Chui, Ka Lun
    Kwong, Yiu Ming
    Ma, Wai Kit
    Cheung, Kin Yin
    Chiu, George
    Yu, Siu Ki
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [6] Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer using 1.5 T MRI-Linac: preliminary data on feasibility and acute patient-reported outcomes
    Rosario Mazzola
    Francesco Cuccia
    Vanessa Figlia
    Michele Rigo
    Luca Nicosia
    Niccolò Giaj-Levra
    Francesco Ricchetti
    Claudio Vitale
    Beatrice Mantoan
    Gioacchino Di Paola
    Antonio De Simone
    Davide Gurrera
    Gianluisa Sicignano
    Stefania Naccarato
    Ruggero Ruggieri
    Filippo Alongi
    La radiologia medica, 2021, 126 : 989 - 997
  • [7] Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer using 1.5 T MRI-Linac: preliminary data on feasibility and acute patient-reported outcomes
    Mazzola, Rosario
    Cuccia, Francesco
    Figlia, Vanessa
    Rigo, Michele
    Nicosia, Luca
    Giaj-Levra, Niccolo
    Ricchetti, Francesco
    Vitale, Claudio
    Mantoan, Beatrice
    Di Paola, Gioacchino
    De Simone, Antonio
    Gurrera, Davide
    Sicignano, Gianluisa
    Naccarato, Stefania
    Ruggieri, Ruggero
    Alongi, Filippo
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2021, 126 (07): : 989 - 997