Wildfire-contingent effects of fuel treatments can promote ecological resilience in seasonally dry conifer forests

被引:65
作者
Stevens, Jens T. [1 ,2 ]
Safford, Hugh D. [3 ,4 ]
Latimer, Andrew M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Grad Grp Ecol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] US Forest Serv, USDA, Vallejo, CA 94592 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[5] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
California; forests; fuel treatments; mixed conifer; resilience; restoration; yellow pine; wildfire; PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS; FIRE SEVERITY; SIERRA-NEVADA; WESTERN US; REDUCTION TREATMENTS; VEGETATION STRUCTURE; CALIFORNIA; RESTORATION; INCREASE; STATES;
D O I
10.1139/cjfr-2013-0460
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Fire suppression has made many seasonally dry conifer forests more susceptible to high-severity wildfires, which cause large changes in forest structure and function. In response, management agencies are applying fuel reduction treatments to millions of acres of forest, with the goal of moderating fire behavior by reducing tree density and understory fuel loads. However, despite their wide application, we still lack basic information about the extent to which these treatments contribute to forest restoration by increasing forest resilience to recurring wildfire events. To address this question, we established 664 plots across 12 different sites in California, USA, where wildfire burned through fuel treatments, and measured a suite of forest characteristics relating to overstory structure, understory cover, and woody plant regeneration. We tested a "wildfire-contingency" hypothesis that there should be strong interactions between treatment and fire, specifically that the direction and magnitude of fuel treatment effects on forest characteristics will depend on subsequent disturbance. This interaction hypothesis had strong support, driven largely by effects on trees: without wildfire, live-tree cover was lower in treated stands than in untreated stands, but after wildfire, it was higher in treated stands than in untreated stands. Treated stands had higher soil moisture and more shrub seedlings than untreated stands without wildfire but had greater soil moisture and fewer shrub seedlings than untreated stands after wildfire. Conversely, litter depth, litter cover, and tree seedling abundance were lower in treated stands than in untreated stands without wildfire but higher in treated stands than in untreated stands after wildfire. Ordination revealed that the magnitude of ecological change attributable to wildfire is lower in treated stands than in untreated stands. We conclude that properly implemented treatments can promote resilience to both first-entry and subsequent wildfires.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 854
页数:12
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments
    Agee, JK
    Skinner, CN
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 211 (1-2) : 83 - 96
  • [2] Allen CD, 2002, ECOL APPL, V12, P1418
  • [3] Barbour M, 2007, TERRESTRIAL VEGETATION OF CALIFORNIA, 3RD EDITION, pXIII
  • [4] Bates D, 2014, lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7, DOI [DOI 10.18637/JSS.V067.I01, 10.18637/jss.v067.i01]
  • [5] Alternative stable states in ecology
    Beisner, BE
    Haydon, DT
    Cuddington, K
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 1 (07) : 376 - 382
  • [6] Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    Brooks, Mollie E.
    Clark, Connie J.
    Geange, Shane W.
    Poulsen, John R.
    Stevens, M. Henry H.
    White, Jada-Simone S.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2009, 24 (03) : 127 - 135
  • [7] Bolker Benjamin M., 2008, Ecological Models and Data in R
  • [8] Multimodel inference - understanding AIC and BIC in model selection
    Burnham, KP
    Anderson, DR
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2004, 33 (02) : 261 - 304
  • [9] Individual covariation in life-history traits: Seeing the trees despite the forest
    Cam, E
    Link, WA
    Cooch, EG
    Monnat, JY
    Danchin, E
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2002, 159 (01) : 96 - 105
  • [10] Can fuel-reduction treatments really increase forest carbon storage in the western US by reducing future fire emissions?
    Campbell, John L.
    Harmon, Mark E.
    Mitchell, Stephen R.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 10 (02) : 83 - 90