Utility of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS-2) in detecting feigned adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

被引:6
作者
Becke, Miriam [1 ]
Fuermaier, Anselm B. M. [1 ]
Buehren, Jannes [1 ]
Weisbrod, Matthias [2 ,3 ]
Aschenbrenner, Steffen [4 ]
Tucha, Oliver [1 ]
Tucha, Lara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Dept Clin & Dev Neuropsychol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] SRH Clin Karlsbad Langensteinbach, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Karlsbad, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Ctr Psychosocial Med, Dept Gen Psychiat, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] SRH Clin Karlsbad Langensteinbach, Dept Clin Psychol & Neuropsychol, Karlsbad, Germany
关键词
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; faking; feigning; non-credible performance; symptom validity; DEFICIT-HYPERACTIVITY-DISORDER; RATING-SCALE; NONCREDIBLE PERFORMANCE; VALIDITY ASSESSMENT; INFREQUENCY INDEX; RESPONSE BIAS; ADHD; EXAGGERATION; COMORBIDITY; MEDICATIONS;
D O I
10.1080/13803395.2019.1621268
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Introduction: The Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS-2) utilizes various strategies in the detection of simulated psychiatric disorders. The present study aimed to examine which of these strategies proves most useful in uncovering feigned attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adulthood. Method: One-hundred seventy-one individuals instructed to feign ADHD were compared to 46 genuine patients with ADHD as well as 99 neurotypical controls in their reports provided on the SIRS-2. Results: Responses provided by simulators resembled those of genuine patients with ADHD on all SIRS-2 subscales with the exception of a supplementary scale tapping Overly Specified symptom reports, where a moderate effect emerged (d = 0.88). Classification accuracy remained low, with particularly poor sensitivity (sensitivity = 19.30%). Sensitivity was higher when the decision rules postulated in the first edition SIRS were applied instead of its successor's decision model, yet this increase in sensitivity came at the price of unacceptably low specificity. Conclusion: The present results call for a disorder-specific instrument for the detection of simulated ADHD and offer starting points for the development of such a tool.
引用
收藏
页码:786 / 802
页数:17
相关论文
共 84 条
  • [31] Evaluation of the CAARS Infrequency Index for the Detection of Noncredible ADHD Symptom Report in Adulthood
    Fuermaier, Anselm B. M.
    Tucha, Lara
    Koerts, Janneke
    Weisbrod, Matthias
    Grabemann, Marco
    Zimmermann, Marco
    Mette, Christian
    Aschenbrenner, Steffen
    Tucha, Oliver
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2016, 34 (08) : 739 - 750
  • [32] Measurement of Stigmatization towards Adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
    Fuermaier, Anselm B. M.
    Tucha, Lara
    Koerts, Janneke
    Mueller, Anna K.
    Lange, Klaus W.
    Tucha, Oliver
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (12):
  • [33] New and Improved? A Comparison of the Original and Revised Versions of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms
    Green, Debbie
    Rosenfeld, Barry
    Belfi, Brian
    [J]. ASSESSMENT, 2013, 20 (02) : 210 - 218
  • [34] Green P., 2008, GREENS NONVERBAL MED
  • [35] Green P., 2003, MANUAL WORD MEMORY T
  • [36] Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception, 3rd edition
    Gudjonsson, Gisli
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 195 (01) : 93 - 94
  • [37] The enhancement use of neuropharmaceuticals: more scepticism and caution needed
    Hall, Wayne D.
    Lucke, Jayne C.
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2010, 105 (12) : 2041 - 2043
  • [38] Harrison A.G., 2006, ADHD REPORT, V14, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1521/ADHD.2006.14.4.1, https://doi.org/10.1521/adhd.2006.14.4.1]
  • [39] Identifying students feigning dyslexia: Preliminary findings and strategies for detection
    Harrison, Allyson G.
    Edwards, Melanie J.
    Parker, Kevin C. H.
    [J]. DYSLEXIA, 2008, 14 (03) : 228 - 244
  • [40] Development of a symptom validity index to assist in identifying ADHD symptom exaggeration or feigning
    Harrison, Allyson G.
    Armstrong, Irene T.
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2016, 30 (02) : 265 - 283