A retrospective comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic Tympanoplasty

被引:39
|
作者
Hsu, Ying-Chieh [1 ]
Kuo, Chin-Lung [2 ]
Huang, Tzu-Chin [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cathay Gen Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, 280 Ren Ai Rd Sec 4, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Taoyuan Armed Forces Gen Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Hsinchu Cathay Gen Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Hsinchu, Taiwan
来源
JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY | 2018年 / 47卷
关键词
Endoscopic ear surgery; Microscopic; Tympanoplasty; Cost-efficacy; MIDDLE-EAR SURGERY; CHOLESTEATOMA;
D O I
10.1186/s40463-018-0289-4
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: This study compares endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty for the treatment of chronic otitis media (COM) without cholesteatoma. Methods: This retrospective study included 153 ears (139 patients) treated surgically (endoscopic or microscopic tympanoplasty) for COM in the absence of cholesteatoma at our hospital between January 2008 and October 2015. The adoption of transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) or microscopic ear surgery (MES) was divided temporally (before and since 2014). Comparisons between these groups focused on the following: (I) surgical outcomes, including successful tympanic membrane healing and post-operative complications; (II) restoration of hearing; and (III) consumption of medical resources, including the duration of surgery and anesthesia. All patients had a follow up period of at least 3 months after surgery. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding surgical outcome or hearing restoration. TEES resulted in the successful healing of 96.2% of ear drums, whereas MES led to successful healing in 92% (p = 0.2826) of cases. The average hearing gains following surgery were 10.27 +/- 6.4 and 12.43 +/- 7.46 dB in TEES and MES, respectively. The consumption of medical resources in the TEES group was lower than that of the MES group (TEES versus MES) regarding the average operating time (87.8 +/- 19.01 min (mins) versus 110.2 +/- 17.0 (mins) (p< 0.0001)) and the mean duration of anesthesia ((for general anesthesia patients) (122.1 +/- 21.25 mins versus 145.8 +/- 16.88 mins) (p <= 0.0001)) Conclusions: The results indicate that TEES can achieve surgical outcomes and hearing restoration comparable to those of MES. In addition, TEES appears to be associated with shorter surgical and anesthesia time, which makes it an ideal alternative for the management of COM without cholesteatoma. Trial registration: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Cathay General Hospital. (CGHIRB No: CGH-P105012).
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Transcanal Resection of Glomus Tympanicum: A Retrospective Comparative Study
    Kunnath, Ansley J.
    Freeman, Michael H.
    Witcher, Ryan
    Patro, Ankita
    Lindquist, Nathan R.
    Tawfik, Kareem O.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2024, 45 (04) : 426 - 429
  • [32] Endoscopic or Microscopic Tympanoplasty Advantages and Disadvantages: A Theory Domain Systematic Review
    Bianchini, Ana Julia
    Berlitz, Vitoria Gabriela
    Mocelin, Aurenzo Goncalves
    Ribeiro, Juliana Ferraz
    Keruk, Joao Gabriel
    Hamerschmidt, Rogerio
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 27 (03) : 528 - 535
  • [33] Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Tympanoplasty: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis
    Gkrinia, Eleni
    Ntziovara, Anna Maria
    Brotis, Alexandros G.
    Tzimkas-Dakis, Konstantinos
    Saratziotis, Athanasios
    Korais, Christos
    Hajiioannou, Jiannis
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2024, 134 (08) : 3466 - 3476
  • [34] Microscopic versus Endoscopic Inlay Butterfly Cartilage Tympanoplasty
    Lee, Se A.
    Kang, Hyun Tag
    Lee, Yun Ji
    Kim, Bo Gyung
    Lee, Jong Dae
    JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2019, 23 (03) : 140 - 144
  • [35] Comparison of transcanal endoscopic tympanoplasty with sterile acellular dermal allograft to conventional endaural microscopic tympanoplasty with tragal perichondrium
    Min, Jia
    Kim, Se-Hyung
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 39 (02) : 167 - 170
  • [36] Comparison of the Efficacy of Endoscopic Tympanoplasty and Microscopic Tympanoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tseng, Chih-Chieh
    Lai, Ming-Tang
    Wu, Chia-Che
    Yuan, Sheng-Po
    Ding, Yi-Fang
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2017, 127 (08) : 1890 - 1896
  • [37] Prognostic role of EAONO/JOS, STAMCO, and ChOLE Staging for Exclusive Endoscopic and Endoscopic-Microscopic Tympanoplasty
    Fermi, Matteo
    Bassano, Edoardo
    Villari, Domenico
    Capriotti, Vincenzo
    Calvaruso, Federico
    Bonali, Marco
    Alicandri-Ciufelli, Matteo
    Marchioni, Daniele
    Presutti, Livio
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2023, 168 (04) : 829 - 838
  • [38] Microscopic Versus Endoscopic Myringoplasty: A comparative study
    Maran, Rakesh Kumar
    Jain, Anil Kumar
    Haripriya, G. R.
    Jain, Sanyogita
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2019, 71 (SUPPL 2) : 1287 - 1291
  • [39] Outcomes and learning curve of endoscopic tympanoplasty: A retrospective analysis of 376 patients
    Cho, Young Sang
    Park, Min Hae
    Han, Ul Gyu
    Son, Se-Eun
    Moon, Il Joon
    LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 7 (06): : 2064 - 2068
  • [40] Can Endoscopic Tympanoplasty Be a Good Alternative to Microscopic Tympanoplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lee, Sang-Yeon
    Lee, Doh Young
    Seo, Yuju
    Kim, Young Ho
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 12 (02) : 145 - 155