Behaviour of Titanium Middle Ear Implants at 1.5 and 3 Tesla Field Strength in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

被引:3
|
作者
Bauknecht, H. C. [1 ]
Jach, C. [1 ]
Krug, L. [1 ]
Schrom, T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Inst Radiol, Abt Neuroradiol, D-10098 Berlin, Germany
[2] Helios Kliniken Bad Saarow, Klin HNO Heilkunde Kopf & Halschirur, Bad Saarow Pieskow, Germany
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; middle ear implants; titanium implants; METALLIC IMPLANTS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; OSSICULAR CHAIN; PROSTHESES; COMPATIBILITY; SAFETY; MRI; RECONSTRUCTION; STAPES; NMR;
D O I
10.1055/s-0028-1100389
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: Investigations into the MRI compatibility of middle ear implants made from titanium alloys with 1.5 and 3.0 tesla MRI systems which are frequently used for imaging diagnostics. Method: 17 different middle ear (ME) implants (ossicular replacement prosthesis (ORP) and ventilation tubes) made from titanium were tested in vitro. Potential warming was determined via an MRI-compatible fibre optic temperature sensor under the influence of sequences with high-level high frequency impulses. An assessment of the attractive force of the implants was carried out placed on a Petri dish under vibration and floating on rubber-sponge (RS) in a water bath. Results: No significant warming of the implants was observed with any of the used sequences at either 3 or 1.5 Tesla field strength (TF). With 3 TF, all 17 implants changed their position on the surface of the water and moved at a slow speed (0.0004-0.0014 m/s) towards the magnetic field. With 1.5 TF, the tested ME implants moved at a maximum speed of 0.0002 m/s and in the case of the ventilation tubes at 0.0005 m/s. Conclusion: No warming occurred in any of the tested middle ear implants at either 1.5 or 3 TF. The attractive forces exerted through the static magnetic field were overall low at 1.5 and 3 TF, indicating that no dislocation is to be expected if intraoperative anchoring is correctly conducted. Nevertheless, the indication for examination at 3 TF should be carefully considered due to the anatomically sensitive region.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 240
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Value of 3 Tesla Field Strength for Musculoskeletal Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Khodarahmi, Iman
    Fritz, Jan
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2021, 56 (11) : 749 - 763
  • [2] Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation after implantation of a titanium cervical disc prosthesis: a comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnet strength
    Jarle Sundseth
    Eva A. Jacobsen
    Frode Kolstad
    Oystein P. Nygaard
    John A. Zwart
    Per K. Hol
    European Spine Journal, 2013, 22 : 2296 - 2302
  • [3] Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation after implantation of a titanium cervical disc prosthesis: a comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnet strength
    Sundseth, Jarle
    Jacobsen, Eva A.
    Kolstad, Frode
    Nygaard, Oystein P.
    Zwart, John A.
    Hol, Per K.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (10) : 2296 - 2302
  • [4] Coronary artery magnetic resonance angiography comparison of high field magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 and 3 Tesla
    Steen, H
    Lima, JAC
    Giannitsis, E
    Katus, HA
    Stuber, M
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (05) : 352A - 352A
  • [5] Clinical 1.5 tesla and "Specialist" 3 tesla magnetic resonance imaging in presurgical epilepsy
    Wieshmann, UC
    Keller, S
    Roberts, N
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 76 (09): : 1315 - 1316
  • [6] CLINICAL BENEFIT OF 3 TESLA MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING RESCANNING IN PATIENTS WITH FOCAL EPILEPSY AND NEGATIVE 1.5 TESLA MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
    Ladino, Lady D.
    Balaguera, Pedro
    Rascovsky, Simon
    Delgado, Jorge
    Llano, Juan
    Hernandez-Ronquillo, Lizbeth
    Gomez-Arias, Bety
    Tellez-Zenteno, Jose F.
    REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION CLINICA-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL INVESTIGATION, 2016, 68 (03): : 112 - 118
  • [7] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Placenta at 1.5 Tesla (T).
    Wright, Caroline
    Morris, David M.
    Baker, Philip N.
    Crocker, Ian P.
    Gowland, Penny A.
    Parker, Geoff J.
    Sibley, Colin P.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2009, 16 (03) : 348A - 348A
  • [8] Magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancement of brain tumors at 3 tesla versus 1.5 tesla
    Nöbauer-Huhmann, IM
    Ba-Ssalamah, A
    Mlynarik, V
    Barth, M
    Schöggl, A
    Heimberger, K
    Matula, C
    Fog, A
    Kaider, A
    Trattnig, S
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2002, 37 (03) : 114 - 119
  • [9] Microleakage beneath orthodontic brackets in high field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) AT 1.5 & 3 Tesla
    Gumus, Esra Bolat
    Satir, Samed
    Kustarci, Alper
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 51 (04)
  • [10] Comparative magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 and 3 tesla for the evaluation of traumatic microbleeds
    Scheid, Rainer
    Ott, Derek V.
    Roth, Henrik
    Schroeter, Matthias L.
    Von Cramon, D. Yves
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2007, 24 (12) : 1811 - 1816