Circularity Brokers: Digital Platform Organizations and Waste Recovery in Food Supply Chains

被引:172
作者
Ciulli, Francesca [1 ]
Kolk, Ans [1 ]
Boe-Lillegraven, Siri [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Business Sch, Muidergracht 12, NL-1018 TV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Circularity brokers; Digital platforms; Food waste recovery; Supply chains; ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS; STRATEGIC CHANGE; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; BUSINESS MODELS; TERTIUS-IUNGENS; ECONOMY; INNOVATION; ISSUE; SENSEMAKING;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-019-04160-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In recent years, researchers and practitioners have increasingly paid attention to food waste, which is seen as highly unethical given its negative environmental and societal implications. Waste recovery is dependent on the creation of connections along the supply chain, so that actors with goods at risk of becoming waste can transfer them to those who may be able to use them as inputs or for their own consumption. Such waste recovery is, however, often hampered by what we call 'circularity holes', i.e., missing linkages between waste generators and potential receivers. A new type of actor, the digital platform organization, has recently taken on a brokerage function to bridge circularity holes, particularly in the food supply chain. Yet, extant literature has overlooked this novel type of brokerage that exploits digital technology for the transfer and recovery of discarded resources between supply chain actors. Our study investigates this actor, conceptualized as a 'circularity broker', and thus unites network research and circular supply chain research. Focusing on the food supply chain, we adopt an interpretive inductive theory-building approach to uncover how platform organizations foster the recovery of waste by bridging circularity holes. We identify and explicate six brokerage roles, i.e., connecting, informing, protecting, mobilizing, integrating and measuring, and discuss them in relation to extant literature, highlighting novelties compared to earlier studies. The final section reflects on contributions, implications, limitations and areas for further research.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 331
页数:33
相关论文
共 139 条
[1]   Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: An organizing framework [J].
Acquier, Aurelien ;
Daudigeos, Thibault ;
Pinkse, Jonatan .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2017, 125 :1-10
[2]  
[Anonymous], Key facts on food loss and waste that you should know!
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, CIRCULAR EC EC BUSIN, DOI DOI 10.1162/108819806775545321
[4]   Competition in two-sided markets [J].
Armstrong, Mark .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 37 (03) :668-691
[5]   Supply chain design and analysis: Models and methods [J].
Beamon, BM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 1998, 55 (03) :281-294
[6]   ON SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS IN A SUPPLY CHAIN CONTEXT [J].
Borgatti, Stephen P. ;
Li, Xun .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2009, 45 (02) :5-22
[7]   Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note [J].
Bowen, Glenn A. .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2008, 8 (01) :137-152
[8]   Explaining the internationalization of ibusiness firms [J].
Brouthers, Keith D. ;
Geisser, Kim Dung ;
Rothlauf, Franz .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2016, 47 (05) :513-534
[9]   Secondhand brokerage: Evidence on the importance of local structure for managers, bankers, and analysts [J].
Burt, Ronald S. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 50 (01) :119-148
[10]   Social Network Analysis: Foundations and Frontiers on Advantage [J].
Burt, Ronald S. ;
Kilduff, Martin ;
Tasselli, Stefano .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 64, 2013, 64 :527-547