iCONCUR: informed consent for clinical data and bio-sample use for research

被引:36
作者
Kim, Hyeoneui [1 ]
Bell, Elizabeth [1 ]
Kim, Jihoon [1 ]
Sitapati, Amy [1 ,2 ]
Ramsdell, Joe [2 ]
Farcas, Claudiu [1 ]
Friedman, Dexter [3 ]
Feupe, Stephanie Feudjio [1 ]
Ohno-Machado, Lucila [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Biomed Informat, 9500 Gilman Dr 0728, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Med, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Clin & Translat Res Inst, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
informed consent; tiered informed consent; EHR data use for research; ATTITUDES; COMPREHENSION; CARE;
D O I
10.1093/jamia/ocw115
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Background: Implementation of patient preferences for use of electronic health records for research has been traditionally limited to identifiable data. Tiered e-consent for use of de-identified data has traditionally been deemed unnecessary or impractical for implementation in clinical settings. Methods: We developed a web-based tiered informed consent tool called informed consent for clinical data and bio-sample use for research ( iCONCUR) that honors granular patient preferences for use of electronic health record data in research. We piloted this tool in 4 outpatient clinics of an academic medical center. Results: Of patients offered access to iCONCUR, 394 agreed to participate in this study, among whom 126 patients accessed the website to modify their records according to data category and data recipient. The majority consented to share most of their data and specimens with researchers. Willingness to share was greater among participants from an Human Immunodeficiency Virus ( HIV) clinic than those from internal medicine clinics. The number of items declined was higher for for-profit institution recipients. Overall, participants were most willing to share demographics and body measurements and least willing to share family history and financial data. Participants indicated that having granular choices for data sharing was appropriate, and that they liked being informed about who was using their data for what purposes, as well as about outcomes of the research. Conclusion: This study suggests that a tiered electronic informed consent system is a workable solution that respects patient preferences, increases satisfaction, and does not significantly affect participation in research.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 387
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Allen Claudia, 2014, EGEMS (Wash DC), V2, P1057, DOI 10.13063/2327-9214.1057
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, BIOMETRICS, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1541-0420.2008.01138_10.X
[3]  
Bell Elizabeth A, 2014, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, V2014, P1699
[4]   Point and Counterpoint: Patient Control of Access to Data in Their Electronic Health Records [J].
Caine, Kelly ;
Tierney, William M. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 :S38-S41
[5]   Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records [J].
Caine, Kelly ;
Hanania, Rima .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2013, 20 (01) :7-15
[6]   The double-edged sword of electronic health records: implications for patient disclosure [J].
Campos-Castillo, Celeste ;
Anthony, Denise L. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2015, 22 (E1) :E130-E140
[7]   A New Initiative on Precision Medicine [J].
Collins, Francis S. ;
Varmus, Harold .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (09) :793-795
[8]  
Cummings SR, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8
[9]  
FDA, 2015, QUEST ANSW GUID IND
[10]   Attitudes of the general public towards the disclosure of individual research results and incidental findings from biobank genomic research in Australia [J].
Fleming, J. ;
Critchley, C. ;
Otlowski, M. ;
Stewart, C. ;
Kerridge, I. .
INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2015, 45 (12) :1274-1279