Building a Global Food Systems Typology: A New Tool for Reducing Complexity in Food Systems Analysis

被引:41
作者
Marshall, Quinn [1 ]
Fanzo, Jessica [2 ]
Barrett, Christopher B. [3 ]
Jones, Andrew D. [4 ]
Herforth, Anna [5 ]
McLaren, Rebecca [6 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Int Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Nitze Sch Adv Int Studies, Washington, DC USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Charles H Dyson Sch Appl Econ & Management, Ithaca, NY USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Nutr Sci, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Global Hlth & Populat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Univ, Berman Inst Bioeth, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
food systems; typology; nutrition; sustainability; agriculture; URBANIZATION; GREEN;
D O I
10.3389/fsufs.2021.746512
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Food systems have a profound impact on diets, nutrition, health, economic development, and environmental sustainability. Yet their complexity poses a persistent challenge in identifying the policy actions that are needed to improve human and planetary health outcomes. Typologies are a useful classification tool to identify similarities and differences among food systems, while reducing this analytical complexity. This study presents a new food system typology, implemented at the country level using parsimonious data that characterize food supply chains, food environments, consumer-related factors, and key outcomes, including dietary intake, nutritional status, health, and environmental impacts. Five food system types are identified: rural and traditional; informal and expanding; emerging and diversifying; modernizing and formalizing; and industrial and consolidated. Patterns across the five system types in key outcome variables align with narratives provided by the food systems and nutrition transition literature, demonstrating the usefulness of this classification method. Substantial heterogeneity nonetheless still exists within individual food system types. Therefore, the recommended use of the typology is in early stages of hypothesis generation, to identify potential risk factors or constraints in the food system that can be explored further at national and sub-national levels.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Almond RE, 2020, LIVING PLANET REPORT
[2]   Capturing farm diversity with hypothesis-based typologies: An innovative methodological framework for farming system typology development [J].
Alvarez, Stephanie ;
Timler, Carl J. ;
Michalscheck, Mirja ;
Paas, Wim ;
Descheemaeker, Katrien ;
Tittonell, Pablo ;
Andersson, Jens A. ;
Groot, Jeroen C. J. .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (05)
[3]   Farm management indicators and farm typologies as a basis for assessments in a changing policy environment [J].
Andersen, Erling ;
Elbersen, Berien ;
Godeschalk, Frans ;
Verhoog, David .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 82 (03) :353-362
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Handbook of Development Economics
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, AGR DEV
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Global Nutrition Report 2015: Actions and Accountability to Advance Nutrition and Sustainable Development
[7]   Food security and food self-sufficiency around the world: A typology of countries [J].
Baer-Nawrocka, Agnieszka ;
Sadowski, Arkadiusz .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03)
[8]  
Bailey K. D., 1994, Typlogies and Taxonomies: An Introduction to Classification Techniques, V7, DOI [10.4135/9781412986397, DOI 10.4135/9781412986397]
[9]  
Barrett C., SOCIOTECHNICAL INNOV
[10]  
Barrett Christopher., Journal of Economic Literature