Seeking learning outcomes appropriate for 'education for sustainable development' and for higher education

被引:51
作者
Shephard, Kerry [1 ]
Harraway, John [2 ]
Lovelock, Brent [3 ]
Mirosa, Miranda [4 ]
Skeaff, Sheila [5 ]
Slooten, Liz [6 ]
Strack, Mick [7 ]
Furnari, Mary [1 ]
Jowett, Tim [2 ]
Deaker, Lynley [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Higher Educ Dev Ctr, Dunedin, New Zealand
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Math Stat, Dunedin, New Zealand
[3] Univ Otago, Dept Tourism, Dunedin, New Zealand
[4] Univ Otago, Dept Food Sci, Dunedin, New Zealand
[5] Univ Otago, Dept Human Nutr, Dunedin, New Zealand
[6] Univ Otago, Dept Zool, Dunedin, New Zealand
[7] Univ Otago, Sch Surveying, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
learning outcomes; evaluation; affective domain; anonymity; Revised New Ecological Paradigm Scale; ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM SCALE; ECOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR; STUDENTS; METAANALYSIS; ATTRIBUTES; VALUES; NEP;
D O I
10.1080/02602938.2015.1009871
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article shares and extends research-based developments at the University of Otago, New Zealand, that seek to explore how students' worldviews change as they experience higher education with us. We emphasise that sustainability attributes may be described in terms of knowledge, skills and competencies but that these are underpinned by affective attributes such as values, attitudes and dispositions; so that 'education for sustainable development' is substantially a quest for affective change. We describe approaches to categorise affective outcomes and conclude that 'education for sustainable development' objectives comprise higher order affective outcomes (leading to behavioural change) that are challenging for higher education to address. Our own work emphasises the need for student anonymity as these higher order outcomes are assessed, evaluated, monitored, researched or otherwise measured using research instruments that focus on worldview. A longitudinal mixed-effects repeat-measures statistical model is described that enables higher education institutions to answer the question of whether or not 'education for sustainable development' objectives are being achieved. Discussion links affect to critical reasoning and addresses the possibility of documenting and assessing the development of lower and mid-order affective outcomes. We conclude that 'education for sustainable development' objectives need to be clearly articulated if higher education is to be able to assess, or evaluate, their achievement.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 866
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Ash S.L., 2009, J APPL HIGHER ED, V1, P25, DOI [10.57186/jalhe2009v1a2p25-48, DOI 10.57186/JALHE2009V1A2P25-48]
  • [2] Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera:: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour
    Bamberg, Sebastian
    Moeser, Guido
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 27 (01) : 14 - 25
  • [3] Barth M., 2007, International Journal of Sustainability for Higher Education, V8, P416, DOI [10.1108/14676370710823582, DOI 10.1108/14676370710823582, 10.1108/1467637071082358]
  • [4] Bloom B.S., 1971, HDB FORMATIVE SUMMAT
  • [5] Bloom Benjamin S., 1956, Handbook 1: Cognitive domain
  • [6] Buissink-Smith Nell, 2011, Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, V5, P101
  • [7] Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2014, COMM ENG CLASS
  • [8] NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM
    DUNLAP, RE
    VANLIERE, KD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION, 1978, 9 (04) : 10 - 19
  • [9] Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale
    Dunlap, RE
    Van Liere, KD
    Mertig, AG
    Jones, RE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2000, 56 (03) : 425 - 442
  • [10] Dunlap RE, 2008, J ENVIRON EDUC, V40, P3, DOI 10.3200/JOEE.40.1.3-18