Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast: Analysis of the effect of different concentrations of contrast material at multi-detector row helical CV

被引:113
作者
Awai, K [1 ]
Takada, K [1 ]
Onishi, H [1 ]
Hori, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Rinku Gen Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Izumisano City, Osaka 5988577, Japan
关键词
computed tomography (CT); contrast enhancement; helical; hepatic arteries; CT; liver neoplasms;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2243011188
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the effect of different iodine concentrations of contrast material on aortic and hepatic enhancement and the detectability of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) and a uniphasic contrast material injection technique. Materials and methods: Two hundred one patients with known or who were suspected of having HCC underwent multi detector row CT; 58 patients with hypervascular HCC were identified. First-, second-, and third-phase scanning was started with the aortic arrival times plus 15 seconds, plus 30 seconds, and plus 105 seconds, respectively. All patients were assigned randomly into two groups. Patients in groups A and B received iopamidol with an iodine concentration of 300 mg/mL and 370 mg/mL, respectively, with the same total iodine load per patient per body weight. The liver and aorta enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast (TLC) were measured. Depiction of hepatic arteries was evaluated visually by two radiologists. Results: During the first phase, aortic enhancement was significantly (P<.01) higher in group B, with no significant difference in hepatic enhancement between the two groups. During the second phase, aortic enhancement was significantly (P<.01) higher in group A, with no significant difference in hepatic enhancement. The TLC was significantly (P<.01) higher in group B during the first phase, but there was no significant difference between the two groups during the second phase. There was no significant difference in any parameters between the two groups during the third phase. Depiction of the hepatic arteries in group B was significantly (P<.05) superior to that in group A. Conclusion: In the arterial phase, administration of a higher concentration of contrast material is effective for a significantly higher TLC. (C) RSNA, 2002.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 763
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [31] Oliver JH, 1996, RADIOLOGY, V201, P1
  • [32] Detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: Value of unenhanced or arterial phase CT imaging or both used in conjunction with conventional portal venous phase Contrast-enhanced CT imaging
    Oliver, JH
    Baron, RL
    Federle, MP
    Rockette, HE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 167 (01) : 71 - 77
  • [33] Optimizing contrast enhancement during helical CT of the liver: A comparison of two bolus tracking techniques
    Schweiger, GD
    Chang, PJ
    Brown, BP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (06) : 1551 - 1558
  • [34] CONSPICUOUSNESS OF HEPATIC METASTASES ON HELICAL CT - EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TIME DELAYS BETWEEN CONTRAST ADMINISTRATION AND SCANNING
    SILVERMAN, PM
    OMALLEY, J
    TEFFT, MC
    COOPER, C
    ZEMAN, RK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 164 (03) : 619 - 623
  • [35] CT FINDINGS IN HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA - CORRELATION OF TUMOR CHARACTERISTICS WITH CAUSATIVE FACTORS, TUMOR SIZE, AND HISTOLOGIC TUMOR GRADE
    STEVENS, WR
    JOHNSON, CD
    STEPHENS, DH
    BATTS, KP
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 191 (02) : 531 - 537
  • [36] CT DIAGNOSIS OF EARLY HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA - SENSITIVITY, FINDINGS, AND CT-PATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION
    TAKAYASU, K
    FURUKAWA, H
    WAKAO, F
    MURAMATSU, Y
    ABE, H
    TERAUCHI, T
    WINTER, TC
    SAKAMOTO, M
    HIROHASHI, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 164 (04) : 885 - 890
  • [37] THE DIAGNOSIS OF SMALL HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS - EFFICACY OF VARIOUS IMAGING PROCEDURES IN 100 PATIENTS
    TAKAYASU, K
    MORIYAMA, N
    MURAMATSU, Y
    MAKUUCHI, M
    HASEGAWA, H
    OKAZAKI, N
    HIROHASHI, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (01) : 49 - 54