Scenario-Based Model Predictive Control with Several Steps for COLREGS Compliant Ship Collision Avoidance

被引:9
作者
Hagen, I. B. [1 ]
Kufoalor, D. K. M. [1 ,2 ]
Johansen, T. A. [1 ]
Brekke, E. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Engn Cybernet, Ctr Autonomous Marine Operat & Syst NTNU AMOS, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Martime Robot, Trondheim, Norway
来源
IFAC PAPERSONLINE | 2022年 / 55卷 / 31期
关键词
Autonomous Surface Vehicles; Collision Avoidance; COLREGS; Model Predictive Control;
D O I
10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.447
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The main question investigated is whether additional decision steps can improve vessel behavior produced by the collision avoidance method scenario based model predictive control (SBMPC). The method, which functions by predicting alternative paths resulting from a finite number of alternative control behaviors, then selecting which behavior to apply by use of a cost function, was originally formulated to allow switching between several behaviors on the prediction horizon. However, current implementations have been limited to a single control step. To compare the single-step and multi-step SBMPC, a simulation study was performed, where different configurations for the number, positioning and possible control actions were tested. In the course of the simulation study it became clear that identifying situations producing a significant difference between the two methods was difficult to identify and the multi-step SBMPC led to only minor improvements in very few scenarios. Nevertheless, multi-step decisions can be visualized to give better situational awareness, and also have additional benefits with other trajectory parameterizations and less uncertain predictions of other ship trajectories. Copyright (C) 2022 The Authors.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 312
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Akdag M., 2022, 14 IFAC C CONTROL AP
[2]   Move blocking strategies in receding horizon control [J].
Cagienard, R. ;
Grieder, P. ;
Kerrigan, E. C. ;
Morari, M. .
JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2007, 17 (06) :563-570
[3]   Least-restrictive move-blocking model predictive control [J].
Gondhalekar, Ravi ;
Imura, Jun-ichi .
AUTOMATICA, 2010, 46 (07) :1234-1240
[4]  
Hagen IB, 2018, IEEE INT CONF ROBOT, P7618
[5]   Ship Collision Avoidance and COLREGS Compliance Using Simulation-Based Control Behavior Selection With Predictive Hazard Assessment [J].
Johansen, Tor Arne ;
Perez, Tristan ;
Cristofaro, Andrea .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2016, 17 (12) :3407-3422
[6]   Autonomous maritime collision avoidance: Field verification of autonomous surface vehicle behavior in challenging scenarios [J].
Kufoalor, D. K. M. ;
Johansen, T. A. ;
Brekke, E. F. ;
Hepso, A. ;
Trnka, K. .
JOURNAL OF FIELD ROBOTICS, 2020, 37 (03) :387-403
[7]  
Kufoalor DKM, 2019, 2019 18TH EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ECC), P2536, DOI [10.23919/ecc.2019.8796273, 10.23919/ECC.2019.8796273]
[8]   A survey of industrial model predictive control technology [J].
Qin, SJ ;
Badgwell, TA .
CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2003, 11 (07) :733-764
[9]  
Tengesdal T., 2022, IEEE T INTELLIGENT T
[10]  
Tengesdal T, 2020, PROCEEDINGS OF 2020 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION FUSION (FUSION 2020), P1020