Synchrotron-Based Techniques Shed Light on Mechanisms of Plant Sensitivity and Tolerance to High Manganese in the Root Environment

被引:75
作者
Blamey, F. Pax C. [1 ]
Hernandez-Soriano, Maria C. [1 ]
Cheng, Miaomiao [2 ]
Tang, Caixian [2 ]
Paterson, David J. [3 ]
Lombi, Enzo [4 ]
Wang, Wei Hong [4 ]
Scheckel, Kirk G. [5 ]
Kopittke, Peter M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Agr & Food Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, Ctr AgriBiosci, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
[3] Australian Synchrotron, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[4] Univ S Australia, Ctr Environm Risk Assessment & Remediat, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
[5] US EPA, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Cincinnati, OH 45224 USA
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
CALLOSE FORMATION; MN ACCUMULATION; HYDRATED ROOTS; METAL-IONS; TOXICITY; SPECIATION; NICKEL; COWPEA; NUTRITION; MAGNESIUM;
D O I
10.1104/pp.15.00726
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Plant species differ in response to high available manganese (Mn), but the mechanisms of sensitivity and tolerance are poorly understood. In solution culture, greater than or equal to 30 mu M Mn decreased the growth of soybean (Glycine max), but white lupin (Lupinus albus), narrow-leafed lupin (Lupin angustifolius), and sunflower (Helianthus annuus) grew well at 100 mM Mn. Differences in species' tolerance to high Mn could not be explained simply by differences in root, stem, or leaf Mn status, being 8.6, 17.1, 6.8, and 9.5 mmol kg(-1) leaf fresh mass at 100 mM Mn. Furthermore, x-ray absorption near edge structure analyses identified the predominance of Mn(II), bound mostly to malate or citrate, in roots and stems of all four species. Rather, differences in tolerance were due to variations in Mn distribution and speciation within leaves. In Mn-sensitive soybean, in situ analysis of fresh leaves using x-ray fluorescence microscopy combined with x-ray absorption near edge structure showed high Mn in the veins, and manganite [Mn(III)] accumulated in necrotic lesions apparently through low Mn sequestration in vacuoles or other vesicles. In the two lupin species, most Mn accumulated in vacuoles as either soluble Mn(II) malate or citrate. In sunflower, Mn was sequestered as manganite at the base of nonglandular trichomes. Hence, tolerance to high Mn was ascribed to effective sinks for Mn in leaves, as Mn(II) within vacuoles or through oxidation of Mn(II) to Mn(III) in trichomes. These two mechanisms prevented Mn accumulation in the cytoplasm and apoplast, thereby ensuring tolerance to high Mn in the root environment.
引用
收藏
页码:2006 / 2020
页数:15
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Linear glandular trichomes of Helianthus (Asteraceae): morphology, localization, metabolite activity and occurrence
    Aschenbrenner, Anna-Katharina
    Horakh, Silke
    Spring, Otmar
    [J]. AOB PLANTS, 2013, 5
  • [2] ROLE OF TRICHOMES IN SUNFLOWER TOLERANCE TO MANGANESE TOXICITY
    BLAMEY, FPC
    JOYCE, DC
    EDWARDS, DG
    ASHER, CJ
    [J]. PLANT AND SOIL, 1986, 91 (02) : 171 - 180
  • [3] Simultaneous hyperaccumulation of nickel, manganese, and calcium in Alyssum leaf trichomes
    Broadhurst, CL
    Chaney, RL
    Angle, JS
    Maugel, TK
    Erbe, EF
    Murphy, CA
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 38 (21) : 5797 - 5802
  • [4] Ionic content in plant extracts determined by ion chromatography with conductivity detection
    Cataldi, TRI
    Margiotta, G
    Del Fiore, A
    Bufo, SA
    [J]. PHYTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS, 2003, 14 (03) : 176 - 183
  • [5] Clarkson D.T., 1988, MANGANESE SOILS PLAN, P101, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-2817-68
  • [6] Accumulation and interaction of calcium and manganese in Phytolacca americana
    Dou, Changming
    Fu, Xiaoping
    Chen, Xincai
    Shi, Jiyan
    Chen, Yingxu
    [J]. PLANT SCIENCE, 2009, 177 (06) : 601 - 606
  • [7] Edwards D.G., 1982, PLANT NUTR, P145
  • [8] ELAMIN OM, 1986, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V111, P582
  • [9] ELAMIN OM, 1986, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V111, P588
  • [10] Characterization of foliar manganese (Mn) in Mn (hyper)accumulators using X-ray absorption spectroscopy
    Fernando, D. R.
    Mizuno, T.
    Woodrow, I. E.
    Baker, A. J. M.
    Collins, R. N.
    [J]. NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2010, 188 (04) : 1014 - 1027