Score for allergic rhinitis (SFAR)

被引:8
作者
Annesi-Maesano, I
Didier, A
Klossek, JM
Chanal, I
Moreau, D
Bousquet, J
机构
[1] INSERM, U472, EARA Epidemiol Affect Resp & Allerg Epidemiol All, F-94807 Villejuif, France
[2] Hop Rangueil, Toulouse, France
[3] CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France
[4] Hop Tenon, F-75970 Paris, France
[5] Hop Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France
来源
REVUE FRANCAISE D ALLERGOLOGIE ET D IMMUNOLOGIE CLINIQUE | 2004年 / 44卷 / 04期
关键词
allergic rhinitis; diagnosis; epidemiology; phenotypes; score; validation;
D O I
10.1016/j.allerg.2003.09.015
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Objectives. - A quantitative Score For Allergic Rhinitis (SFAR) was developed by a panel of French experts to compensate for the absence of a valid epidemiological assessment of allergic rhinitis (AR). Methods. - SFAR includes main characteristics of allergic rhinitis (symptoms, seasonality, triggers, personal history and perception of allergic diseases) and ranges between 0 and 16. SFAR was validated in four different ways by: 1) using psychometric methods (internal validation); 2) taking the specialist's diagnosis and skin prick tests positivity (SPT) as a gold standard in 269 outpatients (diagnosis validation); 3) examining the relationship of allergy markers (total IgE, MultiRAST, eosinophils and SPT) to common aeroallergens in 1332 adults (EGEA Study) (biological validation); 4) randomly selecting a population-based sample of 3001 individuals for a telephone interview (population accessibility). Results. -All validity checks have shown that a SFAR greater than or equal to7 satisfactorily identifies AR. Internal validation of the score was high (Cronbach's alpha coefficient =0.79). Diagnosis validation allowed a distinction to be made among the outpatients with AR from those without (sensitivity =74% [95% CI: 0.69; 0.79], specificity =83% [0.79; 0.87]. positive predictive value =84% [0.80; 0.88], negative predictive value =74% [0.69; 0.79], and Youden's index =0.57, respectively). SFAR greater than or equal to7 was significantly related to all allergy markers; the highest relationships were seen in the case of MultiRAST (OR =12.6 [8.4; 18.7]) and SPT positivity (OR =8.8 [5.9; 13.0]). On average, only three minutes were needed to complete the telephone interview SFAR questionnaire and the questions were well understood. Conclusion. - The Score For Allergic Rhinitis (SEAR) is practicable and useful for studying the prevalence and causation of AR in population settings. (C) 2003 Elsevier SAS. Tous droits reserves.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 399
页数:4
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] The score for allergic rhinitis (SFAR): a simple and valid assessment method in population studies
    Annesi-Maesano, I
    Didier, A
    Klossek, M
    Chanal, I
    Moreau, D
    Bousquet, J
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2002, 57 (02) : 107 - 114
  • [2] Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma
    Bousquet, J
    van Cauwenberge, P
    Khaltaev, N
    Ait-Khaled, N
    Annesi-Maesano, I
    Bachert, C
    Baena-Cagnani, C
    Bateman, E
    Bonini, S
    Canonica, GW
    Carlsen, KH
    Demoly, P
    Durham, SR
    Enarson, D
    Fokkens, WJ
    van Wijk, RG
    Howarth, P
    Ivanova, NA
    Kemp, JP
    Klossek, JM
    Lockey, RF
    Lund, V
    Mackay, I
    Malling, HJ
    Meltzer, EO
    Mygind, N
    Okunda, M
    Pawankar, R
    Price, D
    Scadding, GK
    Simons, FER
    Szczeklik, A
    Valovirta, E
    Vignola, AM
    Wang, DY
    Warner, JO
    Weiss, KB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2001, 108 (05) : S147 - S334
  • [3] Focused principal component analysis: Looking at a correlation matrix with a particular interest in a given variable
    Falissard, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 1999, 8 (04) : 906 - 912
  • [4] Kauffmann F, 2002, REV MAL RESPIR, V19, P323