Maximum likelihood estimation of endogenous switching and sample selection models for binary, ordinal, and count variables

被引:135
作者
Miranda, Alfonso [1 ]
Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia
机构
[1] Keele Univ, Sch Econ & Management Studies, Keele, Staffs, England
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Grad Sch Educ, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ London, Inst Educ, London WC1N 1AZ, England
关键词
st0107; endogenous switching; sample selection; binary variable; count data; ordinal variable; probit; Poisson regression; adaptive quadrature; gllamm; wrapper; ssm;
D O I
10.1177/1536867X0600600301
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Studying behavior in economics, sociology, and statistics often involves fitting models in which the response variable depends on a dummy variable-also known as a regime-switch variable-or in which the response variable is observed only if a particular selection condition is met. In either case, standard regression techniques deliver inconsistent estimators if unobserved factors that affect the response are correlated with unobserved factors that affect the switching or selection variable. Consistent estimators can be obtained by maximum likelihood estimation of a joint model of the outcome and switching or selection variable. This article describes a "wrapper" program, ssm, that calls gllarim (Rabe-Hesketh, Skrondal, and Pickles, GLLAMM Manual [University of California-Berkeley, Division of Biostatistics, Working Paper Series, Paper No. 160]) to fit such models. The wrapper accepts data in a simple structure, has a straightforward syntax, and reports output that is easily interpretable. One important feature of ssm is that the log likelihood can be evaluated using adaptive quadrature (Rabe-Hesketh, Skrondal, and Pickles, Stata Journal 2: 1-21; Journal of Econometrics 128: 301-323).
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 308
页数:24
相关论文
共 48 条
[41]   SMALL SAMPLE COMPARISON OF LIKELIHOOD RATIO, WALD AND SCORE TESTS IN GENERALISED LINEAR MODELS INVOLVING COUNT DATA [J].
Bhat, A. R. Suryanarayana ;
Rao, K. Aruna ;
Latha, K. V. Asha .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND STATISTICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 8 (02) :667-677
[42]   Every Trait Counts: Marginal Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Novel Multidimensional Count Data Item Response Models with Rotation or l1-Regularization for Simple Structure [J].
Beisemann, Marie ;
Holling, Heinz ;
Doebler, Philipp .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2025, 90 (01) :304-330
[43]   Collinearity and two-step estimation of sample selection models: Problems, origins, and remedies [J].
Leung S.F. ;
Yu S. .
Computational Economics, 2000, 15 (3) :173-199
[44]   Two-Step Estimation of Incomplete Information Social Interaction Models With Sample Selection [J].
Hoshino, Tadao .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2019, 37 (04) :598-612
[45]   SEMIPARAMETRIC 2-STAGE ESTIMATION OF SAMPLE SELECTION MODELS SUBJECT TO TOBIT-TYPE SELECTION-RULES [J].
LEE, LF .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1994, 61 (02) :305-344
[46]   Estimation of an endogenous switching regression model with discrete dependent variables: Monte-Carlo analysis and empirical application of three estimators [J].
Kimhi A. .
Empirical Economics, 1999, 24 (2) :225-241
[47]   Bias correction for within-group estimation of panel data models with fixed effects and sample selection [J].
Han, Chirok ;
Lee, Goeun .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2022, 220
[48]   Are marginalized two-part models superior to non-marginalized two-part models for count data with excess zeroes? Estimation of marginal effects, model misspecification, and model selection [J].
Liu X. ;
Zhang B. ;
Tang L. ;
Zhang Z. ;
Zhang N. ;
Allison J.J. ;
Srivastava D.K. ;
Zhang H. .
Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2018, 18 (3) :175-214