Differential catalytic efficiency and enantioselectivity of murine glutathione S-transferase isoenzymes in the glutathione conjugation of carcinogenic anti-diol epoxides of chrysene and benzo(g)chrysene

被引:5
作者
Hu, X [1 ]
Singh, SV [1 ]
机构
[1] MERCY HOSP,MERCY CANC INST,CANC RES LAB,PITTSBURGH,PA 15219
关键词
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; diol epoxides; carcinogenesis; glutathione S-transferase; detoxication;
D O I
10.1006/abbi.1997.0270
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The kinetics of the conjugation of carcinogenic anti-diol epoxides of chrysene (anti-CDE) and benzo(g)chrysene [anti-B(g)CDE] with glutathione (GSH) catalyzed by GSH S-transferase (GST) isoenzymes mGSTP1-1, mGSTM1-1, mGSTA3-3, mGSTA4-4, and GST 9.5 of female A/J mouse tissues has been investigated, When GST activity was measured as a function of varying anti-CDE or anti-B(g)-CDE concentrations at a fixed concentration of GSH, each isoenzyme obeyed Michaelis-Menten kinetics, The catalytic efficiencies (k(cat)/K-m of murine GSTs in the GSH conjugation of anti-CDE were in the order of GST 9.5 > mGSTP1-1 > mGSTM1-1 > mGSTA3-3 > mGSTA4-4, While each GST isoenzyme examined in the present study exhibited preference for the GSH conjugation of (+)-anti-CDE with the (R,S)-diol (S,R)-epoxide absolute configuration, which is a far more potent carcinogen than the (-) anti-CDE [(S,R)-diol (R,S)-epoxide absolute configuration], the enantioselectivity was relatively more pronounced for mGSTP1-1 compared with other murine GSTs, Anti-B(g)CDE was a relatively poor substrate for each GST isoenzyme examined compared with anti-CDE, The catalytic efficiencies of murine GSTs in the GSH conjugation of anti-B(g)CDE were in the order of GST 9.5 > mGSTP1-1 > mGSTM1-1 > mGSTA3-3. With the exception of mGSTM1-1, all other murine GSTs exhibited preference for the GSH conjugation of anti-B(g)CDE enantiomer with the (R,S)-diol (S,R) epoxide absolute configuration, In summary, the results of the present study indicate that the murine GSTs significantly differ in their catalytic efficiency and enantioselectivity in the GSH conjugation of both anti-CDE and anti-B(g)CDE, and that anti-B(g)CDE is a relatively poor substrate for murine GSTs compared with anti-CDE, which may partially account for the observed relatively higher carcinogenic potency of the former compound. (C) 1997 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 324
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Agarwal R, 1997, CANCER RES, V57, P415
[2]   TUMORIGENICITY IN NEWBORN MICE OF FJORD REGION AND OTHER STERICALLY HINDERED DIOL EPOXIDES OF BENZO[G]CHRYSENE, DIBENZO[A,L]PYRENE (DIBENZO[DEF,P]CHRYSENE), 4H-CYCLOPENTA[DEF]CHRYSENE AND FLUORANTHENE [J].
AMIN, S ;
DESAI, D ;
DAI, W ;
HARVEY, RG ;
HECHT, SS .
CARCINOGENESIS, 1995, 16 (11) :2813-2817
[3]   MAMMARY CARCINOGENICITY IN FEMALE CD RATS OF FJORD REGION DIOL EPOXIDES OF BENZO[C]PHENANTHRENE, BENZO[G]CHRYSENE AND DIBENZO[A,L]PYRENE [J].
AMIN, S ;
KRZEMINSKI, J ;
RIVENSON, A ;
KURTZKE, C ;
HECHT, SS ;
ELBAYOUMY, K .
CARCINOGENESIS, 1995, 16 (08) :1971-1974
[4]  
BRADFORD MM, 1976, ANAL BIOCHEM, V72, P248, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
[5]   TUMORIGENICITY OF OPTICAL ENANTIOMERS OF DIASTEREOMERIC BENZO[A]PYRENE 7,8-DIOL-9,10-EPOXIDES IN NEWBORN MICE - EXCEPTIONAL ACTIVITY OF(+)-7-BETA, 8-ALPHA-DIHYDROXY-9-ALPHA, 10-ALPHA-EPOXY-7,8.9.10-TETRAHYDROBENZOL[A]PYRENE [J].
BUENING, MK ;
WISLOCKI, PG ;
LEVIN, W ;
YAGI, H ;
THAKKER, DR ;
AKAGI, H ;
KOREEDA, M ;
JERINA, DM ;
CONNEY, AH .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1978, 75 (11) :5358-5361
[6]  
CHANG RL, 1983, CANCER RES, V43, P192
[7]  
DIPPLE A, 1993, POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC COMPOUNDS : SYNTHESIS, PROPERTIES, ANALYTICAL MEASUREMENTS, OCCURRENCE AND BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS, P807
[8]   DIFFERENT ENZYME-KINETICS DURING THE GLUTATHIONE CONJUGATION OF THE 4 STEREOISOMERS OF THE FJORD-REGION DIOLEPOXIDES OF BENZO[C]PHENANTHRENE BY THE MU-CLASS RAT-LIVER GLUTATHIONE-S-TRANSFERASE HTP-II [J].
FUNK, M ;
GATH, I ;
SEIDEL, A ;
PLATT, KL ;
OESCH, F ;
ZELLER, HD .
BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 47 (03) :505-514
[9]  
GLATT H, 1991, CANCER RES, V51, P1659
[10]  
HABIG WH, 1974, J BIOL CHEM, V249, P7130