Changes in Learning and Foraging Behaviour within Developing Bumble Bee (Bombus terrestris) Colonies

被引:17
作者
Evans, Lisa J. [1 ]
Raine, Nigel E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Holloway Univ London, Sch Biol Sci, Egham, Surrey, England
关键词
HONEY-BEES; DEFENSIVE BEHAVIOR; WORKER SIZE; FLOWER SIZE; BODY-SIZE; SPEED; HYMENOPTERA; PERFORMANCE; EVOLUTION; AGE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0090556
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Organisation in eusocial insect colonies emerges from the decisions and actions of its individual members. In turn, these decisions and actions are influenced by the individual's behaviour (or temperament). Although there is variation in the behaviour of individuals within a colony, we know surprisingly little about how (or indeed if) the types of behaviour present in a colony change over time. Here, for the first time, we assessed potential changes in the behavioural type of foragers during colony development. Using an ecologically relevant foraging task, we measured the decision speed and learning ability of bumble bees (Bombus terrestris) at different stages of colony development. We determined whether individuals that forage early in the colony life cycle (the queen and early emerging workers) behaved differently from workers that emerge and forage at the end of colony development. Whilst we found no overall change in the foraging behaviour of workers with colony development, there were strong differences in foraging behaviour between queens and their workers. Queens appeared to forage more cautiously than their workers and were also quicker to learn. These behaviours could allow queens to maximise their nectar collecting efficiency whilst avoiding predation. Because the foundress queen is crucial to the survival and success of a bumble bee colony, more efficient foraging behaviour in queens may have strong adaptive value.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Alford D.V., 1975, Bumblebees
[2]   Individual versus social complexity, with particular reference to ant colonies [J].
Anderson, C ;
McShea, DW .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2001, 76 (02) :211-237
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Levels of Selection in Evolution
[4]  
ARCHER ME, 1972, J ENTOMOL SER A-GEN, V46, P175
[5]   ACTIVE AND RESTING METABOLISM IN BIRDS - ALLOMETRY, PHYLOGENY AND ECOLOGY [J].
BENNETT, PM ;
HARVEY, PH .
JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1987, 213 :327-363
[6]   Cooperation among unrelated individuals: the ant foundress case [J].
Bernasconi, G ;
Strassmann, JE .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1999, 14 (12) :477-482
[7]   Possible mechanisms for the formation of flower size preferences by foraging bumblebees [J].
Blarer, A ;
Keasar, T ;
Shmida, A .
ETHOLOGY, 2002, 108 (04) :341-351
[8]   Developing an evolutionary ecology of fear: how life history and natural history traits affect disturbance tolerance in birds [J].
Blumstein, DT .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2006, 71 :389-399
[9]   Defensive behavior of honey bees:: Organization, genetics, and comparisons with other bees [J].
Breed, MD ;
Guzmán-Novoa, E ;
Hunt, GJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY, 2004, 49 :271-298
[10]  
BRIAN M. V., 1957, INSECTES SOCIAUX, V4, P177, DOI 10.1007/BF02222152