Specification of merger gains in the Norwegian electricity distribution industry

被引:17
作者
Saastamoinen, Antti [1 ]
Bjorndal, Endre [2 ]
Bjorndal, Mette [2 ]
机构
[1] VATT Inst Econ Res, Helsinki, Finland
[2] NIIH Norwegian Sch Econ, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Mergers; Efficiency estimation; Electricity distribution; Regulation; NONPARAMETRIC FRONTIER ESTIMATION; INCENTIVE REGULATION; POTENTIAL GAINS; DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS; COST EFFICIENCY; MODELS; SFA; DEA; ECONOMIES; UTILITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.014
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Electricity distribution often exhibits economies of scale. In Norway, a number of smaller distribution system operators exist and thus there is potential to restructure the industry, possibly through mergers. However, the revenue cap regulatory model in Norway does not incentivize firms to merge as merging leads to a stricter revenue cap for the merged company. Thus the regulator compensates the firms in order to create such incentives. The amount of compensation is based on the potential gains of the merger estimated using a data envelopment analysis (DEA) based frontier approach introduced by Bogetoft and Wang (2005). DEA is however only one of many possible frontier estimators that can be used in estimation. Furthermore, the returns to scale assumption, the operating environment of firms and the presence of stochastic noise and outlier observations are all known to affect to the estimation of production technology. In this paper we explore how varying assumptions under two alternative frontier estimators shape the distribution of merger gains within the Norwegian distribution industry. Our results reveal that the restructuring policies of the industry may be significantly altered depending how potential gains from the mergers are estimated.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 107
页数:12
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Agrell P, 2016, MERGER INCENTI UNPUB
[2]   Structural and behavioral robustness in applied best-practice regulation [J].
Agrell, Per J. ;
Niknazar, Pooria .
SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2014, 48 (01) :89-103
[3]   DEA and dynamic yardstick competition in scandinavian electricity distribution [J].
Agrell, PJ ;
Bogetoft, P ;
Tind, J .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2005, 23 (02) :173-201
[4]  
Agrell PJ, 2015, 12 INT C EUR EN MARK
[5]  
Ajodhia V., 2005, Utilities Policy, V13, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2004.07.008
[6]   The effects of megamergers on efficiency and prices: Evidence from a bank profit function [J].
Akhavein, JD ;
Berger, AN ;
Humphrey, DB .
REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1997, 12 (01) :95-139
[7]  
Amundsveen R., 2014, RECENT DEV DATAENVEL
[8]  
Amundsveen R., 2016, PRODUCTIVITY EFFICIE
[9]   The StoNED age: the departure into a new era of efficiency analysis? A monte carlo comparison of StoNED and the "oldies" (SFA and DEA) [J].
Andor, Mark ;
Hesse, Frederik .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2014, 41 (01) :85-109
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, DOI 10.1111/1467-8292.00077