Four factor Research Awareness Scale for Nurses in Japanese: Instrument development study

被引:1
作者
Watanabe, Yoshino [1 ]
Oe, Makoto [2 ]
Takemura, Yukie [3 ]
Sasaki, Minako [5 ]
Onishi, Mami [4 ]
Kanda, Katsuya [4 ]
Sanada, Hiromi [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, NYK Line, NYK Grp Healthcare Ctr, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Dept Gerontol Nursing Wound Management, Grad Sch Med, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
[3] Univ Tokyo, Res Hosp, Inst Med Sci, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
[4] Univ Tokyo, Dept Nursing Adm, Grad Sch Med, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
[5] Tokyo Healthcare Univ, Fac Healthcare, Div Nursing, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
evidence-based practice; Japanese; nursing research; research awareness; scale development; NURSING PRACTICE; EXPLORATION;
D O I
10.1111/jjns.12009
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
AimResearch awareness is an important consideration necessary for providing superior nursing care. However, a gap exists between research and clinical practice. A major obstacle to integrating research into clinical practice is the absence of research awareness among nurses. Studies on research awareness have focused primarily on three factors: attitude, competence, and encouragement for conducting research. The Research Awareness Scale for Nurses (RASN) in Japanese incorporates a critical, yet generally overlooked fourth factor of flexible structure for research. The aim of this study was to develop a nursing research awareness scale that could be used to determine the reasons for the lack of interest in research among nurses and to help nursing administrators take steps to integrate research into clinical practice. MethodsThe RASN was developed and tested in three stages. An item pool for the scale was generated from a published work review and focus group interviews. The scale was then tested in a pilot study, and finally in a main study. Reliability and validity were examined by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, one-way anova and correlation analysis. ResultsThe RASN exhibited good validity in the four factor structure (attitude, competence, encouragement, and flexible structure). Cronbach's alpha exhibited good internal consistency. The RASN was significantly and positively correlated with research-related education and activities. ConclusionThe RASN had good internal consistency, content validity, discriminant validity, and construct validity. These findings demonstrate that the RASN is a useful instrument for evaluating approaches toward the integration of research into clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 241
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Alcock D, 1990, Can J Nurs Res, V22, P7
[2]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
[3]  
BRETT JLL, 1987, NURS RES, V36, P344
[4]   Utilization of nursing research in practice and application strategies to raise research awareness amongst nurse practitioners: a model for success [J].
Camiah, S .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1997, 26 (06) :1193-1202
[5]   SCREE TEST FOR NUMBER OF FACTORS [J].
CATTELL, RB .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1966, 1 (02) :245-276
[6]  
DeVellis R. F., 2016, Scale Development: Theory and Applications, V4th
[7]   INDICATORS FOR NURSING PRACTICE - THE USE OF RESEARCH FINDINGS [J].
HUNT, J .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1981, 6 (03) :189-194
[8]  
Jolley Sue, 2002, Nurs Stand, V16, P33
[9]   THE VARIMAX CRITERION FOR ANALYTIC ROTATION IN FACTOR-ANALYSIS [J].
KAISER, HF .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1958, 23 (03) :187-200
[10]   Evaluation of a program to increase evidence-based practice change [J].
Larrabee, June H. ;
Sions, Jacqueline ;
Fanning, Mary ;
Withrow, Mary Lynne ;
Ferretti, Andrea .
JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2007, 37 (06) :302-310