Endoscopic electrocautery dilation of benign anastomotic colonic strictures: a single-center experience

被引:21
作者
Bravi, Ivana [1 ]
Ravizza, Davide [1 ]
Fiori, Giancarla [1 ]
Tamayo, Darina [1 ]
Trovato, Cristina [1 ]
De Roberto, Giuseppe [1 ]
Genco, Chiara [1 ]
Crosta, Cristiano [1 ]
机构
[1] European Inst Oncol, Div Endoscopy, Via Ripamonti 435, I-20141 Milan, Italy
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2016年 / 30卷 / 01期
关键词
Anastomotic strictures; Colon; Electrocautery dilation; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-015-4191-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Benign anastomotic colonic stenosis sometimes occur after surgery and usually require surgical or endoscopic dilation. Endoscopic dilation of anastomotic colonic strictures by using balloon or bougie-type dilators has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in multiple uncontrolled series. However, few data are available on safety and efficacy of endoscopic electrocautery dilation. The aim of our study was to retrospectively investigate safety and efficacy of endoscopic electrocautery dilation of postsurgical benign anastomotic colonic strictures. Methods Sixty patients (37 women; median age 63.6 years, range 22.6-81.7) with benign anastomotic colonic or rectal strictures treated with endoscopic electrocautery dilation between June 2001 and February 2013 were included in the study. Anastomotic stricture was defined as a narrowed anastomosis through which a standard colonoscope could not be passed. Only annular anastomotic strictures were considered suitable for electrocautery dilation which consisted of radial incisions performed with a precut sphincterotome. Treatment was considered successful if the colonic anastomosis could be passed by a standard colonoscope immediately after dilation. Recurrence was defined as anastomotic stricture reappearance during follow-up. Results The time interval between colorectal surgery and the first endoscopic evaluation or symptoms development was 7.3 months (1.3-60.7). Electrocautery dilation was successful in all the patients. There were no procedure-related complications. Median follow-up was 35.5 months (2.0-144.0). Anastomotic stricture recurrence was observed in three patients who were successfully treated with electrocautery dilation and Savary dilation. Conclusions Endoscopic electrocautery dilation is a safe and effective treatment for annular benign anastomotic postsurgical colonic strictures.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 232
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Araujo SEA, 2008, SURG LAPARO ENDO PER, V18, P565, DOI 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31818754f4
[2]  
Belverde B, 2012, G CHIR, V33, P243
[3]   The lifelong risk of metachronous colorectal cancer justifies long-term colonoscopic follow-up [J].
Bouvier, Anne-Marie ;
Latournerie, Marianne ;
Jooste, Valerie ;
Lepage, Come ;
Cottet, Vanessa ;
Faivre, Jean .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 44 (04) :522-527
[4]   Endoscopic treatment of benign anastomotic colorectal stenosis with electrocautery [J].
Brandimarte, G ;
Tursi, A ;
Gasbarrini, G .
ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 32 (06) :461-463
[5]   ETIOLOGY OF DISRUPTION OF INTESTINAL ANASTOMOSES [J].
IRVIN, TT ;
GOLIGHER, JC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1973, 60 (06) :461-464
[6]   COLORECTAL ANASTOMOTIC STENOSIS - RESULTS OF A SURVEY OF THE ASCR MEMBERSHIP [J].
LUCHTEFELD, MA ;
MILSOM, JW ;
SENAGORE, A ;
SURRELL, JA ;
MAZIER, WP .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1989, 32 (09) :733-736
[7]  
MORGENSTERN L, 1981, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V116, P141
[8]   ENDOSCOPIC DILATION OF COLONIC POSTOPERATIVE STRICTURES [J].
PIETROPAOLO, V ;
MASONI, L ;
FERRARA, M ;
MONTORI, A .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1990, 4 (01) :26-30
[9]   Risk factors for colorectal anastomotic stenoses and their impact on quality of life: what are the lessons to learn? [J].
Polese, L. ;
Vecchiato, M. ;
Frigo, A. C. ;
Sarzo, G. ;
Cadrobbi, R. ;
Rizzato, R. ;
Bressan, A. ;
Merigliano, S. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (03) :e124-e128
[10]   Results of reoperations in colorectal anastomotic strictures. [J].
Schlegel, RD ;
Dehni, N ;
Parc, R ;
Caplin, S ;
Tiret, E .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (10) :1464-1468