Why Pseudonyms? Deception as Identity Preservation Among Jazz Record Companies, 1920-1929

被引:61
作者
Phillips, Damon J. [1 ]
Kim, Young-Kyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
organizational identity; deception; cultural markets; ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTITY; IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT; INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE; SECURITIES ANALYSTS; INDUSTRY; BANKRUPTCY; EMERGENCE; MOVEMENT; PRODUCT; IMAGE;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.1080.0371
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper theoretically and empirically engages the relationship between organizational identity and deception using the market for early jazz recordings as a setting. In this setting, pseudonyms (where a recording is reissued under a fictitious name) were used deceptively as a way to preserve a firm's identity while selling pro. table but identity-threatening products to the mass market. Firms founded in the Victorian Era actively sought alignment with the cultural elite and used pseudonyms to deceive observers into believing that their production of cultural products was consistent with their Victorian Era identity. In effect, pseudonyms allowed these firms to decouple their position in identity space from their position in product space by inflating production of identity-preserving products. Using product data from jazz discographies, record company directories, and record advertisements in major U.S. newspapers, we provide strong empirical evidence that Victorian Era firms were active in using pseudonyms to preserve their identities.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 499
页数:19
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
*A N MARQ CO, 1962, WHO WAS WHO AM 1897
[2]  
AKERLOF GA, 1993, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P1
[3]  
Albert Stuart., 1985, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V7, P263, DOI [DOI 10.1057/CRR.2008.31, DOI 10.1177/1059601112473815]
[4]  
Aldridge B. L., 1983, VICTOR TALKING MACHI
[5]  
[Anonymous], NY TIMES 0122
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1962, JAZZ WHITE AM ACCEPT
[7]  
Bielby DD, 2005, RES SOC ORG, V23, P1
[8]   ''Anything but heavy metal'': Symbolic exclusion and musical dislikes [J].
Bryson, B .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1996, 61 (05) :884-899
[9]   Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the US brewing industry [J].
Carroll, GR ;
Swaminathan, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2000, 106 (03) :715-762
[10]  
Caves RichardE., 2000, Creative Industries: Contracts Between Art and Commerce