How does economic complexity influence income inequality? New evidence from international data

被引:70
作者
Lan Khanh Chu [1 ,2 ]
Dung Phuong Hoang [3 ]
机构
[1] Vietnam Banking Acad, Banking Res Inst, 12 Chua Boc St, Hanoi, Vietnam
[2] Univ Econ Ho Chi Minh City, Inst Business Res, 59C Nguyen Dinh Chieu St, Hochiminh City, Vietnam
[3] Vietnam Banking Acad, Fac Int Business, 12 Chua Boc St, Hanoi, Vietnam
关键词
Economic complexity; Income inequality; Moderating effect; Panel data; BIASED TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE; PANEL-DATA; EXPORT DIVERSIFICATION; INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY; EARNINGS INEQUALITY; KUZNETS CURVE; GROWTH; EMPLOYMENT; COUNTRIES; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2020.08.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the relationship between economic complexity and income inequality. Using panel data on eighty-eight countries from 2002 to 2017 and two estimation methods, this paper finds that economic complexity is significantly associated with higher income inequality. Moreover, because building economic sophistication is a long and costly process, we further identify whether the changes in the nature of this relationship is conditional on the evolution of other economic and social factors. The results provide qualified evidence that when the level of education, government spending, and trade openness reach certain thresholds, they facilitate the beneficial aspects of higher economic complexity on reducing with income inequality. Conversely, in an environment with less education, ineffective government spending, and low economic openness, economic complexity fails to reduce income inequality. Our findings are relevant for policymakers in tailoring their policies toward combating inequality in the process of developing a knowledge-based economy. (C) 2020 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 57
页数:14
相关论文
共 113 条
[1]  
Acemoglu D., 2005, HDB EC GROWTH, V1, DOI [10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01006-3., DOI 10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01006-3.]
[2]  
Acemoglu D, 2012, NEW YORK REV BOOKS, V59, P85
[3]   Dynamics and Stability of Constitutions, Coalitions, and Clubs [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Egorov, Georgy ;
Sonin, Konstantin .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (04) :1446-1476
[4]   Income distribution determinants and public spending efficiency [J].
Afonso, Antonio ;
Schuknecht, Ludger ;
Tanzi, Vito .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INEQUALITY, 2010, 8 (03) :367-389
[5]   Economic diversification in Saudi Arabia: Myth or reality? [J].
Albassam, Bassam A. .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2015, 44 :112-117
[6]   Openness and inequality in developing countries: A review of theory and recent evidence [J].
Anderson, E .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 33 (07) :1045-1063
[7]   DOES GOVERNMENT SPENDING AFFECT INCOME INEQUALITY? A META-REGRESSION ANALYSIS [J].
Anderson, Edward ;
D'Orey, Maria Ana Jalles ;
Duvendack, Maren ;
Esposito, Lucio .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2017, 31 (04) :961-987
[8]   The impact of government policies on income inequality and the translation of growth into income poverty reduction: protocol for two systematic reviews [J].
Anderson, Edward ;
d'Orey, Maria Ana Jalles ;
Duvendack, Maren ;
Esposito, Lucio .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS, 2015, 7 (04) :484-498
[9]   Is Corruption Really Bad for Inequality? Evidence from Latin America [J].
Andres, Antonio R. ;
Ramlogan-Dobson, Carlyn .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2011, 47 (07) :959-976
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2017, J EC STRUCT, DOI DOI 10.1186/S40008-017-0063-1