5,926 hysterectomies: complications described by Clavien-Dindo classification

被引:8
作者
Alliende, Rodrigo I. [1 ]
Carrasco, Alvaro M. [1 ]
Levancini, Marco [2 ,3 ]
Kovoor, Elias [4 ]
Guzman-Rojas, Rodrigo A. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Miranda-Mendoza, Ignacio [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Florida, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Santiago, Chile
[2] Hosp Padre Hurtado, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Santiago, Chile
[3] Univ Desarrollo, Clin Alemana Santiago, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Santiago, Chile
[4] Darent Valley Hosp, Dartford, England
[5] Hosp Clin Univ Chile, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Santiago, Chile
关键词
Hysterectomy; complication; reoperation; Clavien-Dindo classification;
D O I
10.1080/01443615.2020.1835843
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Hysterectomy is the most common major gynaecological surgery. Due to its high volume, the analysis of its results is relevant. The objective of this study was to describe intraoperative complications and reoperations, for both benign and malignant causes, using the Clavien-Dindo classification (approved by local ethics committee, number 100220). Between 2000 and 2019, 5926 elective hysterectomies were performed, of which 90.2% were for benign aetiology and 9.8% for malignant causes. The abdominal route was 52.7%, vaginal 40.1% and laparoscopic 7.2%. Intraoperative complications and reoperations (grade III Clavien-Dindo) were 4% and 2.1%, respectively. Oncological surgery had significantly more intraoperative complications (10% vs. 3.4%) and reoperations (3.6% vs. 1.9%) than benign procedures. Noteworthy, intraoperative complications required a new operation in only 3.4% for malignant and 2.8% for benign surgery. Our data showed the relevance of detecting and rectifying intraoperative complications during surgery, which consequently leads to a lower reoperation rate, minimising postoperative morbidity and mortality for patients. Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? The surgical complications of hysterectomy, both intraoperative and postoperative, are extensively described. However, this information is not well systematised, in which elective and emergency surgery are mixed. In addition to the above, there are few documents comparing the results of hysterectomies due to benign versus malignant causes. What the results of this study add? Using the Clavien-Dindo classification, this study adds an organised description of intraoperative complications and reoperations of hysterectomy in the context of elective surgery. In addition, it provides information on the comparison between surgery for benign versus malignant causes, as well as information on intraoperative complications requiring a new operation. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? These findings provide clear and orderly data about the risks of elective hysterectomy and showed the relevance of detecting and rectifying intraoperative complications during the procedure. This is useful for specialists to preoperatively identify the risks for each hysterectomy group and provide their patients with more detailed information during informed consent.
引用
收藏
页码:1102 / 1106
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [2] Bogani G, 2014, ANTICANCER RES, V34, P5703
  • [3] Learning Curve of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy With Pelvic and/or Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy in the Early and Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Comparison of the First 50 and Second 50 Cases
    Chong, Gun Oh
    Park, Nae Yoon
    Hong, Dae Gy
    Cho, Young Lae
    Park, Il Soo
    Lee, Yoon Soon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2009, 19 (08) : 1459 - 1464
  • [4] Changes in the demographics and perioperative care of stage IA2/IB1 cervical cancer over the past 16 years
    Covens, A
    Rosen, B
    Murphy, J
    Laframboise, S
    DePetrillo, AD
    Lickrish, G
    Colgan, T
    Chapman, W
    Shaw, P
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 81 (02) : 133 - 137
  • [5] Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
    Dindo, D
    Demartines, N
    Clavien, PA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) : 205 - 213
  • [6] The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy
    Garry, R
    Fountain, J
    Mason, S
    Napp, V
    Brown, J
    Hawe, J
    Clayton, R
    Abbott, J
    Phillips, G
    Whittaker, M
    Lilford, R
    Bridgman, S
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7432): : 129 - 133
  • [7] Lepine L A, 1997, MMWR CDC Surveill Summ, V46, P1
  • [8] Ten years of progress-improved hysterectomy outcomes in Finland 1996-2006: a longitudinal observation study
    Makinen, Juha
    Brummer, Tea
    Jalkanen, Jyrki
    Heikkinen, Anna-Mari
    Fraser, Jaana
    Tomas, Eija
    Harkki, Paivi
    Sjoberg, Jari
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (10):
  • [9] Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: Our instruments and technique
    Malzoni, Mario
    Tinelli, Raffaele
    Cosentino, Francesco
    Perone, Ciro
    Iuzzolino, Domenico
    Rasile, Marianna
    Tinelli, Andrea
    [J]. SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2009, 18 (04): : 289 - 297
  • [10] The VALUE national hysterectomy study: description of the patients and their surgery
    Maresh, MJA
    Metcalfe, MA
    McPherson, K
    Overton, C
    Hall, V
    Hargreaves, J
    Bridgman, S
    Dobbins, J
    Casbard, A
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 109 (03) : 302 - 312