Undecidable Cases of Model Checking Probabilistic Temporal-Epistemic Logic

被引:0
作者
Van Der Meyden, Ron [1 ]
Patra, Manas K. [2 ]
机构
[1] UNSW Sydney, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Cent Univ Rajasthan, Dept Data Sci & Analyt, NH 8, Bandar Seendri 305817, Rajasthan, India
关键词
Logic of knowledge; logic of probability; partially observable Markov chains; model checking; decidability; KNOWLEDGE; VERIFICATION;
D O I
10.1145/3409250
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
We investigate the decidability of model checking logics of time, knowledge, and probability, with respect to two epistemic semantics: the clock and synchronous perfect recall semantics in partially observable discrete-time Markov chains. Decidability results are known for certain restricted logics with respect to these semantics, subject to a variety of restrictions that are either unexplained or involve a longstanding unsolved mathematical problem. We show that mild generalizations of the known decidable cases suffice to render the model checking problem definitively undecidable. In particular, for the synchronous perfect recall semantics, a generalization from temporal operators with finite reach to operators with infinite reach renders model checking undecidable. The case of the clock semantics is closely related to a monadic second-order logic of time and probability that is known to be decidable, except on a set of measure zero. We show that two distinct extensions of this logic make model checking undecidable. One of these involves polynomial combinations of probability terms, the other involves monadic second-order quantification into the scope of probability operators. These results explain some of the restrictions in previous work.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Reachability problems for Markov chains [J].
Akshay, S. ;
Antonopoulos, Timos ;
Ouaknine, Joel ;
Worrell, James .
INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, 2015, 115 (02) :155-158
[2]  
Alur R., 1990, Proceedings. Fifth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (90CH2897-7), P414, DOI 10.1109/LICS.1990.113766
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1977, Probability Theory
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1968, THESIS
[5]  
B��chi J.R., 1960, Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math., V6, P66
[6]  
Beauquier D, 2006, J LOGIC COMPUT, V16, P461, DOI [10.1093/logcom/exl004, 10.1093/logcom/ex1004]
[7]  
Cassaigne J., 2014, ABS14040644 ARXIV
[8]  
Clarke E. M., 1981, LOG PROGR WORKSH, P52, DOI DOI 10.1007/BFB0025774
[9]   AUTOMATIC VERIFICATION OF FINITE-STATE CONCURRENT SYSTEMS USING TEMPORAL LOGIC SPECIFICATIONS [J].
CLARKE, EM ;
EMERSON, EA ;
SISTLA, AP .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 8 (02) :244-263
[10]   ON THE COMPLEXITY OF SPACE BOUNDED INTERACTIVE PROOFS [J].
CONDON, A ;
LIPTON, RJ .
30TH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1989, :462-467