Antimicrobial sensitivity and efficacy of sanitizers against the Salmonella spp. isolated from swine slaughterhouse in southern Brazil

被引:3
作者
Colla, Fernanda Lucia
Mion, Ligiani [1 ]
Parizotto, Luana [2 ]
dos Santos, Lilian Andriva [3 ]
Pilotto, Fernando [2 ]
Rodrigues, Laura Beatriz [2 ]
do Nascimento, Vladimir Pinheiro [4 ]
dos Santos, Luciana Ruschel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Passo Fundo, FAMV, Curso Med Vet, BR-99052900 Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil
[2] FAMV UPF, Curso Med Vet, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil
[3] FAMV UPF, Programa Posgrad Bioexpt, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Fac Vet, Ctr Diagnost & Pesquisa Patol Aviaria, BR-91540000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
来源
PESQUISA VETERINARIA BRASILEIRA | 2014年 / 34卷 / 04期
关键词
Salmonella spp; antimicrobials; sanitizers; swine slaughterhouses; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-736X2014000400003
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial sensitivity and efficacy of three sanitizers against Salmonella spp. isolated from carcasses in swine slaughterhouse. Thirty nine of 120 samples were positive for Salmonella spp. The antimicrobials tested included: penicillin G 10 U, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid 30mcg, ampicillin 10mcg, chloramphenicol 30mcg, tetracycline 30mcg, streptomycin 10mcg, gentamicin 10mcg, neomycin 30mcg, enrofloxacin 5mcg, sulfazotrim 25mcg, sulfonamide 300mcg and trimetropim 5mcg. In the tests with sanitizers were used chlorhexidine, quaternary ammonia and peracetic acid, which were put in contact intervals of 1, 5, 10 and 15 minutes. Antimicrobial resistance was observed using penicillin (100%), tetracycline (94.9%), trimetropim (89.7%), and ampicillin (87.2%). None of the antimicrobials was 100% effective against the samples tested. Amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (86.7%), neomycin (86.7%) and chloramphenicol (64.1%) showed better antimicrobial action. In tests of efficacy of sanitizers, 0.5% peracetic acid was effective at 10 minutes (94.6%) and 15 minutes (97.3%) of contact; 1% quaternary ammonia at 10 minutes (89.2%) and 15 minutes (97.3%) and 0.5% chlorhexidine at 10 minutes (70.3%) and 15 minutes (72.8%). All samples tested were multidrug resistance and six (15.3%) showed resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfonamide and tetracycline (ACSSuT group) indicating the need to monitor the spread of antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella spp. isolated from swine. The most effective sanitizing against the bacteria tested was 0.5% peracetic acid per 15 minutes, reinforcing the need to monitor the effectiveness of products sanitizers against Salmonella spp.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 324
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 130 MIN AGR PEC AB
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, PERFORMANCE STANDARD
[4]  
Beltrame C.A., 2009, U U REGIONAL INTEGRA
[5]  
Bernardi MM, 2011, FARMACOLOGIA APLICAD, V1, P473
[6]  
Castagna S. M. F., 2001, Arquivos da Faculdade de Veterinaria, UFRGS, V29, P44
[7]   In vitro evaluation of chlorhexidine, quaternary ammonium and peracetic acid against Salmonella Heidelberg isolated from poultry slaughterhouse in 2005 and 2009 [J].
Colla, Fernanda Lucia ;
Rodrigues, Laura B. ;
Dickel, Elci Lotar ;
Borsoi, Anderlise ;
do Nascimento, Vladimir Pinheiro ;
dos Santos, Luciana Ruschel .
PESQUISA VETERINARIA BRASILEIRA, 2012, 32 (04) :289-292
[8]  
Delazari I, 2003, AN C FACT CIENC TECN
[9]  
Domingues P.F., 2001, MANEJO SANITARIO ANI
[10]  
Estrela Carlos, 2003, Braz. Dent. J., V14, P58