Intra-professional dynamics in translational health research: The perspective of social scientists

被引:29
作者
Currie, Graeme [1 ]
El Enany, Nellie [1 ]
Lockett, Andy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
关键词
Translational health research; Epistemic communities; Social scientists; Professional dynamics; CLAHRC; England; KNOWLEDGE; CARE; LEADERSHIP; CLINICIAN; SOCIOLOGY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.045
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In contrast to previous studies, which focus upon the professional dynamics of translational health research between clinician scientists and social scientists (inter-professional contestation), we focus upon contestation within social science (intra-professional contestation). Drawing on the empirical context of Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs) in England, we highlight that although social scientists accept subordination to clinician scientists, health services researchers attempt to enhance their position in translational health research vis-a-vis organisation scientists, whom they perceive as relative newcomers to the research domain. Health services researchers do so through privileging the practical impact of their research, compared to organisation scientists' orientation towards development of theory, which health services researchers argue is decoupled from any concern with healthcare improvement. The concern of health services researchers lies with maintaining existing patterns of resource allocation to support their research endeavours, working alongside clinician scientists, in translational health research. The response of organisation scientists is one that might be considered ambivalent, since, unlike health services researchers, they do not rely upon a close relationship with clinician scientists to carry out research, or more generally, garner resource. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 88
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Abbott A., 1988, SYSTEM PROFESSIONS, DOI [10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001, DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226189666.001.0001]
[2]   Biomedical scientists' perception of the social sciences in health research [J].
Albert, Mathieu ;
Laberge, Suzanne ;
Hodges, Brian D. ;
Regehr, Glenn ;
Lingard, Lorelei .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2008, 66 (12) :2520-2531
[3]   Boundary-Work in the Health Research Field: Biomedical and Clinician Scientists' Perceptions of Social Science Research [J].
Albert, Mathieu ;
Laberge, Suzanne ;
Hodges, Brian D. .
MINERVA, 2009, 47 (02) :171-194
[4]   Health systems, systems thinking and innovation [J].
Atun, Rifat .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2012, 27 :4-8
[5]  
Becher T., 1989, ACAD TRIBES TERRITOR
[6]  
Bernier N. F., 2005, SOCIAL SCI HUMANITIE, P124
[7]  
Butler D., 2008, NATURE, V453, P84
[8]   Developing, integrating, and perpetuating new ways of applying sociology to health, medicine, policy, and everyday life [J].
Clair, Jeffrey Michael ;
Clark, Cullen ;
Hinote, Brian P. ;
Robinson, Caroline O. ;
Wasserman, Jason A. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2007, 64 (01) :248-258
[9]   Let's dance: Organization studies, medical sociology and health policy [J].
Currie, Graeme ;
Dingwall, Robert ;
Kitchener, Martin ;
Waring, Justin .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2012, 74 (03) :273-280
[10]  
De Villiers J., 2005, SOCIAL SCI HUMANITIE, P122