Fragmented authorities, institutional misalignments, and challenges to renewable energy transition: A case study of wind power curtailment in China

被引:59
作者
Cai, Yifan [1 ]
Aoyama, Yuko [1 ]
机构
[1] Clark Univ, Grad Sch Geog, 950 Main St, Worcester, MA 01610 USA
关键词
Socio-technical transition; Fragmented authoritarianism; Wind power curtailment; Institutional misalignments; ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE; MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE; POLICY; GENERATION; POLITICS; RETHINKING; MARKET; STATE; TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.021
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To date, challenges to renewable energy transition have been discussed largely based on the cases and experiences from the Global North. In this paper, we aim at broadening our understanding of this specific sociotechnical transition by incorporating the case of wind power development in China. Based on the analysis of policy and legal documents, we examine how institutions are organized and incentives are distributed among relevant stakeholders. We argue that China's significant wind curtailment problem has been produced and exacerbated by multiple axes of institutional misalignments stemming from China's fragmented energy bureaucracy. Through the study of the Chinese approach to renewable energy transition, our goal is to demonstrate the institutional plurality of socio-technical transition and the context specificity of its challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 79
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Overview of Wind Power Industry Value Chain Using Diamond Model: A Case Study from China
    Liu, Jicheng
    Wei, Qiushuang
    Dai, Qiongjie
    Liang, Chunyan
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2018, 8 (10):
  • [32] Renewable Power Potential from Municipal Solid Waste: A Case Study in Jiangxi, China
    Aftab, Rafiq Muhammad
    Zhang, Liguo
    Kung, Chih-Chun
    SAGE OPEN, 2021, 11 (04):
  • [33] An Empirical Study on the Drivers Promoting Renewable Energy Development: The Case of Heilongjiang Province of China
    Wang Si
    Colton, John
    Yang Xin-cai
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (11TH) VOL I, 2015, : 181 - 191
  • [34] Towards a 90% renewable energy future: A case study of an island in the South China Sea
    Ye, Bin
    Zhang, Kai
    Jiang, JingJing
    Miao, Lixin
    Li, Ji
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 142 : 28 - 41
  • [35] Exploring blockchain for the energy transition: Opportunities and challenges based on a case study in Japan
    Ahl, A.
    Yarime, M.
    Goto, M.
    Chopra, Shauhrat S.
    Kumar, Nallapaneni Manoj.
    Tanaka, K.
    Sagawa, D.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 117
  • [36] Renewable energy in sustainable cities: Challenges and opportunities by the case study of Nusantara Capital City (IKN)
    Yudiartono, Yudiartono
    Santosa, Joko
    Fitriana, Ira
    Wijaya, Prima Trie
    Rahardjo, Irawan
    Wahid, La Ode Muhammad Abdul
    Siregar, Erwin
    Hesty, Nurry Widya
    Fithri, Silvy Rahmah
    Sugiyono, Agus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT-IJRED, 2024, 13 (06): : 1136 - 1148
  • [37] Between path dependencies and renewable energy potentials: A case study of the Egyptian power system
    Dallmann, Christoph
    Schmidt, Matthew
    Moest, Dominik
    ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2022, 41
  • [38] An analysis of the wind power development factors by Generalized Bass Model: A case study of China's eight bases
    She, Zhen-Yu
    Cao, Rui
    Xie, Bai-Chen
    Ma, Jia-Jun
    Lan, Sheng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 231 : 1503 - 1514
  • [39] Institutional transition transition and implementation path for cultivated land protection in highly urbanized regions: A case study of Shenzhen, China
    Su, Mo
    Guo, Renzhong
    Hong, Wuyang
    LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 81 : 493 - 501
  • [40] Energy storage reduces costs and emissions even without large penetration of renewable energy: The case of China Southern Power Grid
    Li, Mingquan
    Shan, Rui
    Virguez, Edgar
    Patino-Echeverri, Dalia
    Gao, Shuo
    Ma, Haichao
    ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 161