Comparing the efficiency of different computation intelligence techniques in predicting accident frequency

被引:15
作者
Amiri, Amir Mohammadian [1 ]
Nadimi, Navid [2 ]
Yousefian, Amin [3 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, McMaster Inst Transportat & Logist MITL, 1280 Main St West,Gen Sci Bldg Rm 206, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Shahid Bahonar Univ Kerman, Fac Engn, Pajoohesh Sq, Kerman, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, POB 1684613114, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Safety; Prediction; Accident; Artificial neural network; Fuzzy; Optimization; CRASH; SPEED; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.iatssr.2020.03.003
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Until now, considerable efforts have been made to determine which modelling technique performs the best for predicting accident frequency based on crash data. In this regard, the presented study seeks to compare four types of Computational Intelligence (CI) modelling techniques in accident frequency prediction in urban segments, including Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), Hybrid ANFIS-Genetic Algorithm (H-ANFIS-GA), and Hybrid ANFIS-Particle Swarm Optimization (H-ANFIS-PSO). Accordingly, different variables relating to traffic condition and road specifications were employed as independent variables, using the dataset consisting of 1370 crash occurred in Mashhad (Iran), in 2014. According to the results, H-ANFIS-GA exhibited the best performance in forecasting accident frequency. In contrast, PSO did not improve ANFIS performance, and it caused a negative influence on its prediction accuracy. Although the ANFIS model performed better than the developed ANN, it came in the third most accurate models. Additionally, the effect of each independent variable on predicted crash frequency was evaluated using sensitivity analysis. (C) 2020 International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 292
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Identifying crash propensity using specific traffic speed conditions [J].
Abdel-Aty, M ;
Pande, A .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2005, 36 (01) :97-108
[2]  
Abdelwahab H., 2001, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1, P6, DOI 10.3141%2F1746-02.
[3]   AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENT APPROACH TO TRAFFIC ACCIDENT ESTIMATION: MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION [J].
Akgungor, Ali Payidar ;
Dogan, Erdem .
TRANSPORT, 2009, 24 (02) :135-142
[4]  
Amiri A. M., 2018, TRANSPORTATION RES B
[5]   A comparison between Artificial Neural Network and Hybrid Intelligent Genetic Algorithm in predicting the severity of fixed object crashes among elderly drivers [J].
Amiri, Amir Mohammadian ;
Sadri, Amirhossein ;
Nadimi, Navid ;
Shams, Moe .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2020, 138
[6]  
Behbahani H., 2016, J FORECASTING, V37, P767
[7]  
Behbahani Hamid, 2018, J FORECASTING J FORC, V37, DOI [10.1002/for.2542, DOI 10.1002/FOR.2542INTHISISSUE]
[8]  
Bessedik S.A., 2013, JEE, V13
[9]   A novel method for imminent crash prediction and prevention [J].
Chen, Zhi ;
Qin, Xiao .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2019, 125 :320-329
[10]   An Improved Deep Learning Model for Traffic Crash Prediction [J].
Dong, Chunjiao ;
Shao, Chunfu ;
Li, Juan ;
Xiong, Zhihua .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2018,