Comparison between Positive and Negative Corona Discharges by Hydrodynamic Plasma Simulations

被引:0
作者
Zogning, Calvin [1 ]
Lobry, Jacques [1 ]
Moiny, Francis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mons, Gen Phys Dept, Fac Engn, B-7000 Mons, Belgium
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF 2020 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRICAL INSULATING MATERIALS (ISEIM 2020) | 2020年
关键词
corona discharge; negative and positive glow discharge; nonthermal hydrodynamic plasma; continuity equation; finite element method; DC CORONA; ELECTRON;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Corona discharges are due to the ionization of the gas between two electrodes when the electric field near one of them is very strong. The lack of a complete understanding of the physical processes in corona discharge in both positive and negative polarity means that interest in corona discharge is still current. In this work, we use a more realistic hydrodynamic plasma model which considers 12 charged species such electron, ions and molecules, and 32 chemical reactions present in the plasma. The digital algorithm based on the finite element method is implemented using the commercial software COMSOL Multiphysics (c). A geometrical configuration of a 1D-axisymmetric wire-cylinder is considered and the set of reactions takes place in the radial direction given the symmetry of the system. The results show that the electron density in the negative corona is four orders of magnitude greater than that in the positive corona. The total number of electrons in the plasma layer of the negative corona is more than 50 times that produced in the positive corona. Under identical temperature and pressure conditions, the weakest corona current in positive polarity, which implies a lower ignition DC voltage. Temperature has an opposite effect on the distribution of the electron density present in the plasma. While the rise in temperature causes a rapid increase in the density of electrons in negative corona, the increase is slower in positive corona. In both cases, the electric field is constant on the conductor surface, however the space charge modifies the local electric field.
引用
收藏
页码:552 / 560
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   FINITE-ELEMENT SOLUTION OF MONOPOLAR CORONA EQUATION [J].
ABDELSALAM, M ;
FARGHALLY, M ;
ABDELSATTAR, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL INSULATION, 1983, 18 (02) :110-119
[2]   Total Variation Diminishing technique in numerical simulation of Trichel corona in air [J].
Adamiak, Kazimierz ;
Malevanets, Anatoly .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROSTATICS, 2017, 87 :110-122
[3]   Model of the negative DC corona plasma: Comparison to the positive DC corona plasma [J].
Chen, JH ;
Davidson, JH .
PLASMA CHEMISTRY AND PLASMA PROCESSING, 2003, 23 (01) :83-102
[4]   Electron density and energy distributions in the positive DC corona: Interpretation for corona-enhanced chemical reactions [J].
Chen, JH ;
Davidson, JH .
PLASMA CHEMISTRY AND PLASMA PROCESSING, 2002, 22 (02) :199-224
[5]  
Cobine J.D., 1958, Gaseous conductors: theory and engineering applications
[6]  
Donmot A., 2007, COMSOL US C GREN FRA
[7]   Simulation of dc atmospheric pressure argon micro glow-discharge [J].
Farouk, Tanvir ;
Farouk, Bakhtier ;
Staack, David ;
Gutsol, Alexander ;
Fridman, Alexander .
PLASMA SOURCES SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 15 (04) :676-688
[8]   MODES OF CORONA DISCHARGES IN AIR [J].
GIAO, TN ;
JORDAN, JB .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1968, PA87 (05) :1207-&
[9]  
Goldman M., 1978, CORONA DISCHARGE
[10]   Solving the Boltzmann equation to obtain electron transport coefficients and rate coefficients for fluid models [J].
Hagelaar, GJM ;
Pitchford, LC .
PLASMA SOURCES SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 14 (04) :722-733