Shear bond strength and microleakage of a new self-etch adhesive pit and fissure sealant

被引：12

作者：

Pitchika, Vinay ^{[1
]}

Birlbauer, Sebastian ^{[1
]}

Chiang, Meng-Ling ^{[1
,2
]}

Schuldt, Christoph ^{[1
]}

Crispin, Alexander ^{[3
]}

Hickel, Reinhard ^{[1
]}

Kuehnisch, Jan ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Operat Dent & Periodontol, Munich, Germany

[2] Chang Gung Univ, Taipei Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Pediat Dent Oral Diag & Oral Pathol, Coll Med, Taipei, Taiwan

[3] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Inst Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, Munich, Germany

来源：

DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL | 2018年 / 37卷 / 02期

关键词：

Pit and fissure sealant; Shear-bond test; Self-etch adhesive; Acid etching; In vitro testing; ENAMEL; DEMINERALIZATION; CARIES;

D O I：

10.4012/dmj.2017-072

中图分类号：

R78 [口腔科学];

学科分类号：

1003 ;

摘要：

This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) and microleakage of a new self-etch adhesive-based fissure sealant (EG) on aprismatic enamel in comparison to conventional fissure sealing with 30 s acid etching (CG). The fissures were sealed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Each group was divided into 3 subgroups: 1-day water storage, 3-month water storage, and 5,000x thermocycling. After measuring SBS using the Ultradent method, failure mode was analyzed. In additional 16 teeth, microleakage was tested using dye penetration method. Pairwise comparisons were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U-Test. Multiple linear regression was performed to assess the factors influencing on SBS. EG had significantly lower mean SBS (4.1 MPa +/- 2.1) than the CG (17.6 MPa +/- 6.4). CG (1.1%) performed significantly better than the EG (12.8%) in microleakage analysis. The tested EG yielded significantly inferior results and its clinical use should be decided after weighing its pros and cons.

引用

页码：266 / 271

页数：6

共 18 条

[1]

[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY

[2]

Bassir Leila, 2012, Indian J Dent Res, V23, P806, DOI 10.4103/0970-9290.111267

[3] Which Factors Influence the Shear Bond Strength of Sealant Materials? [J].

Chiang, Meng-Ling ;

Birlbauer, Sebastian ;

Lo, Yi-Fang ;

Pitchika, Vinay ;

Crispin, Alexander ;

Ilie, Nicoleta ;

Hickel, Reinhard ;

Kuehnisch, Jan .

JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 18 (05) :397-+

[4]

Dhillon J K, 2012, J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, V30, P288, DOI 10.4103/0970-4388.108922

[5] Fluoride release and recharging ability of new dental sealants [J].

Dionysopoulos D. ;

Sfeikos T. ;

Tolidis K. .

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 2016, 17 (1) :45-51

[6] A caries susceptibility classification of tooth surfaces by survival time [J].

Hannigan, A ;

O'Mullane, DM ;

Barry, D ;

Schäfer, F ;

Roberts, AJ .

CARIES RESEARCH, 2000, 34 (02) :103-108

[7]

Heintze Siegward D, 2011, Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, V121, P1024

[8]

International Organization for Standardization, 2013, 29022 ISO

[9]

Javadinejad Shahrzad, 2012, Indian J Dent Res, V23, P247, DOI 10.4103/0970-9290.100435

[10] Inhibition of enamel demineralization by buffering effect of S-PRG filler-containing dental sealant [J].

Kaga, Masayuki ;

Kakuda, Shinichi ;

Ida, Yusuke ;

Toshima, Hirokazu ;

Hashimoto, Masanori ;

Endo, Kazuhiko ;

Sano, Hidehiko .

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 2014, 122 (01) :78-83

← 1 2 →