A Framework for Defining Sustainable Energy Transitions: Principles, Dynamics, and Implications

被引:30
作者
Sgouridis, Sgouris [1 ]
Csala, Denes [1 ]
机构
[1] Masdar Inst Sci & Technol, Inst Ctr Smart & Sustainable Syst, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
关键词
sustainable energy transition; energy economics; renewable energy; system dynamics; RETURN; EROI; OIL; LESSONS;
D O I
10.3390/su6052601
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While partial energy transitions have been observed in the past, the complete transition of a fossil-based energy system to a sustainable energy one is historically unprecedented on a large scale. Switching from an economy based on energy stocks to one based on energy flows requires a social paradigm shift. This paper defines Sustainable Energy Transition (SET) and introduces a set of five propositions that prescribe its sustainability. The propositions are comprehensive, spanning environmental constraints, resource availability, equity, and the transition dynamics from an energy and economic accounting perspective aimed at addressing all three pillars of sustainability. In order to rigorously define the constraints of SET a theoretical energy economy framework is introduced along with the concept of the renewable energy investment ratio. The paper concludes with a practical application of the SET propositions on the global energy system and identifies an order of magnitude underinvestment in the renewable energy investment ratio in comparison to the estimated level needed for a controlled transition that satisfies all propositions. The option of drastically increasing this ratio in the future may not be available as it would reduce societally available energy, imposing unacceptably high energy prices that would induce either fossil resource extraction beyond the safely recoverable resources or energy poverty.
引用
收藏
页码:2601 / 2622
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, WORLD POP 2300
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, World Energy Outlook 2012
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, UNBURNABLE CARBON AR
[4]   Ten Reasons to Take Peak Oil Seriously [J].
Brecha, Robert J. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (02) :664-694
[5]   GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY - TOWARD DEFINITION [J].
BROWN, BJ ;
HANSON, ME ;
LIVERMAN, DM ;
MERIDETH, RW .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1987, 11 (06) :713-719
[6]   Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation [J].
Brown, MT ;
Ulgiati, S .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 9 (1-2) :51-69
[7]   Embodied energy analysis and EMERGY analysis: A comparative view [J].
Brown, MT ;
Herendeen, RA .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 19 (03) :219-235
[8]  
Cavallo AlfredJ., 2004, NAT RESOUR RES, V13, P211, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11053-004-0129-2
[9]  
Christensen C.M., 2016, The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail
[10]   Energy Balance of the Global Photovoltaic (PV) Industry - Is the PV Industry a Net Electricity Producer? [J].
Dale, Michael ;
Benson, Sally M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (07) :3482-3489