On the paradigmatic nature of affixal semantics in English and Dutch

被引:33
作者
Booij, G [1 ]
Lieber, R
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1515/ling.2004.011
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This article looks in some detail at the semantics of the affixes -er and -ee in English, at the affix -er in Dutch, and at the fact that Dutch seems to lack a specific process of word formation analogous to -ee in English. We also look at the formation of subject- and object-oriented nouns in a larger context, raising the question of what happens in a language that lacks a productive derivational means for expressing a particular morphological concept. We argue that an explanation of the most deviant derivations with these affixes arises only when we consider the paradigmatic nature of affixal semantics.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 357
页数:31
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
BAAYEN H, 1989, THESIS VRIJE U AMSTE
[2]   Episodic -ee in English:: A thematic role constraint on new word formation [J].
Barker, C .
LANGUAGE, 1998, 74 (04) :695-727
[3]  
Booij G.E., 2002, The morphology of Dutch
[4]   FORM AND MEANING IN MORPHOLOGY - THE CASE OF DUTCH AGENT-NOUNS [J].
BOOIJ, GE .
LINGUISTICS, 1986, 24 (03) :503-517
[5]  
De Haas Wim, 1993, Morfologisch handboek van het Nederlands. Een overzicht van de woordvorming
[6]  
DECALUWE J, 1992, SPEKTATOR, V21, P137
[7]  
DOWTY D, 1979, WORD MEAING MONTAGUE
[8]  
HEYVAERTS L, 2001, 176 KATH U LEUV
[9]  
HIGGINBOTHAM J, 1985, LINGUIST INQ, V16, P547
[10]   PARTS AND BOUNDARIES [J].
JACKENDOFF, R .
COGNITION, 1991, 41 (1-3) :9-45