Human Anatomy: Let the Students Tell Us How to Teach

被引:147
作者
Davis, Christopher R. [1 ]
Bates, Anthony S. [2 ]
Ellis, Harold [3 ]
Roberts, Alice M. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Frenchay Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Bristol BS16 1LE, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Clin Sci, Fac Med & Dent, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Dept Anat & Human Sci, London, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] Severn Deanery, Postgrad Sch Surg, Natl Hlth Serv, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
gross anatomy education; medical education; cadaver dissection; anatomy laboratory; anatomy demonstrators; computers in anatomical education; e-learning; anatomical sciences education; MEDICAL-SCHOOL; TOMORROWS DOCTORS; CLINICAL MEDICINE; GROSS-ANATOMY; DEMONSTRATOR; DISSECTION; ATTITUDES; FUTURE; EDUCATION; CONTINUE;
D O I
10.1002/ase.1424
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Anatomy teaching methods have evolved as the medical undergraduate curriculum has modernized. Traditional teaching methods of dissection, prosection, tutorials and lectures are now supplemented by anatomical models and e-learning. Despite these changes, the preferences of medical students and anatomy faculty towards both traditional and contemporary teaching methods and tools are largely unknown. This study quantified medical student and anatomy faculty opinion on various aspects of anatomical teaching at the Department of Anatomy, University of Bristol, UK. A questionnaire was used to explore the perceived effectiveness of different anatomical teaching methods and tools among anatomy faculty (AF) and medical students in year one (Y1) and year two (Y2). A total of 370 preclinical medical students entered the study (76% response rate). Responses were quantified and intergroup comparisons were made. All students and AF were strongly in favor of access to cadaveric specimens and supported traditional methods of small-group teaching with medically qualified demonstrators. Other teaching methods, including e-learning, anatomical models and surgical videos, were considered useful educational tools. In several areas there was disharmony between the opinions of AF and medical students. This study emphasizes the importance of collecting student preferences to optimize teaching methods used in the undergraduate anatomy curriculum. (C) 2013 American Association of Anatomists.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 272
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [11] Does Clinical Anatomy deserve another 25 years? Reflections on how Clinical Anatomy has changed in the past quarter century
    Carmichael, Stephen W.
    [J]. CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2012, 25 (02) : 143 - 145
  • [12] Item difficulty in the evaluation of computer-based instruction: An example from neuroanatomy
    Chariker, Julia H.
    Naaz, Farah
    Pani, John R.
    [J]. ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2012, 5 (02) : 63 - 75
  • [13] Computer-Based Learning of Neuroanatomy: A Longitudinal Study of Learning, Transfer, and Retention
    Chariker, Julia H.
    Naaz, Farah
    Pani, John R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 103 (01) : 19 - 31
  • [14] Dangerfield P, 2000, CLIN ANAT, V13, P444, DOI 10.1002/1098-2353(2000)13:6<444::AID-CA9>3.0.CO
  • [15] 2-W
  • [16] Demystifying the Millennial Student: A Reassessment in Measures of Character and Engagement in Professional Education
    DiLullo, Camille
    McGee, Patricia
    Kriebel, Richard M.
    [J]. ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2011, 4 (04) : 214 - 226
  • [17] Medical Education in the Anatomical Sciences: The Winds of Change Continue to Blow
    Drake, Richard L.
    McBride, Jennifer M.
    Lachman, Nirusha
    Pawlina, Wojciech
    [J]. ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2009, 2 (06) : 253 - 259
  • [18] Ellis H, 2001, CLIN ANAT, V14, P149, DOI 10.1002/1098-2353(200103)14:2<149::AID-CA1023>3.0.CO
  • [19] 2-U
  • [20] Ellis H., 2002, Surgery-Oxford International Edition, V20, pi, DOI DOI 10.1383/SURG.20.8.0.14518