Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using Best Worst Method

被引:282
作者
Rezaei, Jafar [1 ]
Wang, Jing [1 ]
Tavasszy, Lori [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Transport & Logist Grp, NL-2628 BX Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Supplier evaluation; Supplier segmentation; Supplier development; Best Worst Method (BWM); Multi-criteria decision-making; CHAIN MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL CAPABILITY; PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; PORTFOLIO APPROACH; SELECTION; PERSPECTIVE; COMMITMENT; MODEL; TRUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.073
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The strategic supplier-related activity of supplier segmentation focuses on the evaluation of suppliers, identifying different approaches, identifying the most suitable criteria and proper methods to segment the suppliers. The main aim of the evaluation of suppliers is to form different groups from the selected suppliers to create different supplier management strategies for segments involved. Supplier development is another strategic supplier-related activity designed to upgrade the performance level of suppliers in order to create and maintain a network of competent suppliers, which has a major influence on the competitive advantages of a buying company. To allocate scarce resources more efficiently, we should design different supplier development strategies for different supplier segments. This is where we actually use the evaluation for suppliers. This paper proposes an integrative approach that includes capabilities and willingness as two dimensions for evaluating and subsequently segmenting suppliers. The results of that segmentation are then used as the main basis for supplier development. The integrative approach proposed in this paper is of significant importance, as it helps companies apportion their managerial resources more efficiently. We use a new multi-criteria decision-making method called Best Worst Method (BWM) to segment suppliers. A supplier development conceptual model is proposed to develop the suppliers in the different segments. The proposed framework is further applied to a medium-sized high-tech company as input to validate the model. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:9152 / 9164
页数:13
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Azadi Majid, 2013, International Journal of Services and Operations Management, V14, P321
[2]   CONFIGURATIONS OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS - A COMPARISON BETWEEN US AND JAPANESE AUTOMAKERS [J].
BENSAOU, M ;
VENKATRAMAN, N .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1995, 41 (09) :1471-1492
[3]   Power and interdependence in buyer supplier relationships:: A purchasing portfolio approach [J].
Caniels, Marjolein C. J. ;
Gelderman, Cees J. .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2007, 36 (02) :219-229
[4]   Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature [J].
Chai, Junyi ;
Liu, James N. K. ;
Ngai, Eric W. T. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (10) :3872-3885
[5]   Suppliers capability and price analysis chart [J].
Chen, KL ;
Chen, KS ;
Li, RK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2005, 98 (03) :315-327
[6]   An investigation into commitment in non-Western industrial marketing relationships [J].
Coote, LV ;
Forrest, EJ ;
Tam, TW .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2003, 32 (07) :595-604
[7]  
Cousins P., 2007, STRATEGIC SUPPLY MAN
[8]   The implications of socialization and integration in supply chain management [J].
Cousins, Paul D. ;
Menguc, Bulent .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2006, 24 (05) :604-620
[9]  
De Boer L., 2001, EUROPEAN J PURCHASIN, V7, P75, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00028-9, 10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00028-9]
[10]   Integrated product line design and supplier selection: A multi-objective optimization paradigm [J].
Deng, S. ;
Aydin, R. ;
Kwong, C. K. ;
Huang, Yun .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 70 :150-158