Survival of patients with bacteraemia in relation to initial empirical antimicrobial treatment

被引:40
作者
Hanon, FX
Monnet, DL
Sorensen, TL
Molbak, K
Pedersen, G
Schonheyder, H
机构
[1] Statens Serum Inst, Dept Epidemiol Res, Danish Epidemiol Sci Ctr, DK-2300 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Statens Serum Inst, Dept Microbiol Res & Dev, DK-2300 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Aalborg Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Aalborg, Denmark
[5] Aalborg Hosp, Dept Clin Microbiol, Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00365540110080827
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Our objective was to determine the impact on mortality of the coverage and spectrum of initial empirical antimicrobial treatment among bacteraemic patients in the county of Northern Jutland, Denmark. Patients aged >15 y from the bacteraemia register who had their first episode of bacteraemia between 1996 and 1998 were retrospectively included. Outcome was defined as survival from the day that the first positive blood culture was taken. Follow-up was 180 d. Survival probability was estimated using a Cox proportional hazard model. Conservative treatment was defined as penicillin G, ampicillin or similar, methicillin or similar, metronidazole, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim or a combination of these. We studied 2058 primary episodes of bacteraemia. The distribution of empirical antimicrobial treatments was: conservative/covered, 25.8%; non-conservative/covered, 36.9%; conservative/did not cover, 16.0%; non-conservative/did not cover, 4.8%; and no antimicrobial, 16.5%. After adjusting for risk factors, patients receiving a treatment that covered the microorganism(s) had an increased survival (relative risk [RR] = 0.50 [0.32-0.77]; p = 0.002). Among covered episodes, receiving a conservative treatment significantly increased survival (RR = 0.69 [0.54-0.88]; p = 0.002). This study confirms that appropriate empirical antimicrobial treatment increases the survival of bacteraemic patients. Furthermore, conservative treatment was associated with a longer survival among patients covered by empirical therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 528
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
*AS ROSC, 1998, NEOS SUSC TEST
[2]   INCIDENCE, RISK-FACTORS, AND OUTCOME OF SEVERE SEPSIS AND SEPTIC SHOCK IN ADULTS - A MULTICENTER PROSPECTIVE-STUDY IN INTENSIVE-CARE UNITS [J].
BRUNBUISSON, C ;
DOYON, F ;
CARLET, J ;
DELLAMONICA, P ;
GOUIN, F ;
LEPOUTRE, A ;
MERCIER, JC ;
OFFENSTADT, G ;
REGNIER, B .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (12) :968-974
[3]   Impact of infectious diseases specialists and microbiological data on the appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy for bacteremia [J].
Byl, B ;
Clevenbergh, P ;
Jacobs, F ;
Struelens, MJ ;
Zech, F ;
Kentos, A ;
Thys, JP .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1999, 29 (01) :60-66
[4]   Variation in antibiotic use in the European Union [J].
Cars, O ;
Mölstad, S ;
Melander, A .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9271) :1851-1853
[5]  
*DAN VET LAB, 2000, DANMAP 99 CONS ANT A
[6]  
*EUR ANT RES SURV, 2000, EARSS NEWSL, V3, P1
[7]   CDC DEFINITIONS FOR NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS, 1988 [J].
GARNER, JS ;
JARVIS, WR ;
EMORI, TG ;
HORAN, TC ;
HUGHES, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1988, 16 (03) :128-140
[8]  
HOJBY N, 2001, UGESKRIFT LAEGER, V163, P66
[9]   Bacteremia due to methicillin-resistant staphylococci occurs more frequently in neutropenic patients who received antimicrobial prophylaxis and is associated with higher mortality in comparison to methicillin-sensitive bacteriemia [J].
Horvathova, Z ;
Spanik, S ;
Sufliarsky, J ;
Mardiak, J ;
Pichna, P ;
Pichnova, E ;
Krajcik, S ;
Mraz, M ;
Chmelik, B ;
Dacok, J ;
Beresova, J ;
Krupova, I ;
Hrachova, A ;
Trupl, J ;
Kunova, A ;
Krcmery, V .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 1998, 10 (01) :55-58
[10]  
Hosmer D. W., 1999, APPL SURVIVAL ANAL R