Analysis of Click and Swept-Tone Auditory Brainstem Response Results for Moderate and Severe Sensorineural Hearing Loss

被引:0
作者
Tan, Jingqian [1 ]
Luo, Jia [1 ]
Wang, Xin [2 ]
Jiang, Yanbing [2 ]
Zeng, Xiangli [1 ]
Chen, Shixiong [2 ]
Li, Peng [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat sen Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Affiliated Hosp 3, 600 Tianhe Rd, Guangzhou 510630, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Shenzhen Inst Adv Technol, CAS Key Lab Human Machine Intelligence Synergy Sy, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Swept tone; Click; Auditory brainstem response; Sensorineural hearing loss; LATENCIES;
D O I
10.1159/000507691
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Introduction: Auditory brainstem response (ABR) is one of the commonly used methods in clinical settings to evaluate the hearing sensitivity and auditory function. The current ABR measurement usually adopts click sound as the stimuli. However, there may be partial ABR amplitude attenuation due to the delay characteristics of the cochlear traveling wave along the basilar membrane. To solve that problem, a swept-tone method was proposed, in which the show-up time of different frequency components was adjusted to compensate the delay characteristics of the cochlear basilar membrane; therefore, different ABR subcomponents of different frequencies were synchronized. Methods: The normal hearing group, moderate sensorineural hearing loss group, and severe sensorineural hearing loss group underwent click ABR and swept-tone ABR with different stimulus intensities. The latencies and amplitudes of waves I, III, and V in 2 detections were recorded. Results: It was found that the latency of each of the recorded I, III, and V waves detected by swept-tone ABR was shorter than that by click ABR in both the control group and experimental groups. In addition, the amplitude of each of the recorded I, III, and V waves, except V waves under 60 dB nHL in the moderate sensorineural hearing loss group, detected by swept-tone ABR was larger than that by click ABR. The results also showed that the swept-tone ABR could measure the visible V waves at lower stimulus levels in the severe sensorineural hearing loss group. Conclusion: Swept-tone improves the ABR waveforms and helps to obtain more accurate threshold to some extent. Therefore, the proposed swept-tone ABR may provide a new solution for better morphology of ABR waveform, which can help to make more accurate diagnosis about the hearing functionality in the clinic.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 344
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Auditory Recognition of Words-in-Noise in Normal Hearing and Mild-to-Severe Sensorineural Hearing Loss with Different Configurations
    Nasiri, Elahe
    Jalilvand, Hamid
    Mahdavi, Mohammad Ebrahim
    Koravand, Amineh
    [J]. AUDITORY AND VESTIBULAR RESEARCH, 2024, 33 (02): : 110 - 117
  • [32] Comparison of threshold estimation in infants with hearing loss or normal hearing using auditory steady-state response evoked by narrow band CE-chirps and auditory brainstem response evoked by tone pips
    Michel, Franck
    Jorgensen, Kristoffer Foldager
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2017, 56 (02) : 99 - 105
  • [33] Long-term audiometric follow-up of click-evoked auditory brainstem response in hearing impaired infants
    Schoonhoven, R
    Lamoré, PJJ
    de Laat, JAPM
    Grote, JJ
    [J]. AUDIOLOGY, 2000, 39 (03): : 135 - 145
  • [34] A case report of absent auditory steady-state responses in an elderly person with moderate sensorineural hearing loss
    Jafarzadeh, Sadegh
    [J]. AUDITORY AND VESTIBULAR RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (01): : 60 - 63
  • [35] Evaluation of Speed and Accuracy of Next-Generation Auditory Steady State Response and Auditory Brainstem Response Audiometry in Children With Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss
    Sininger, Yvonne S.
    Hunter, Lisa L.
    Hayes, Deborah
    Roush, Patricia A.
    Uhler, Kristin M.
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2018, 39 (06) : 1207 - 1223
  • [36] Risk analysis of unilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss in children
    Friedman, Adva B.
    Guillory, Ryan
    Ramakrishnaiah, Raghu H.
    Frank, Robert
    Gluth, Michael B.
    Richter, Gresham T.
    Dornhoffer, John L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2013, 77 (07) : 1128 - 1131
  • [37] Comparison of LS CE-Chirp and Click Stimuli in Auditory Brainstem Responses in High-Frequency Hearing Loss
    Belet, Ugur
    Aksit, Ates Mehmet
    Kosemihal, Ebru
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2025, 46 (02) : 347 - 352
  • [38] Contralateral Masking in the Measurement of Auditory Brainstem Responses with Air-Conducted Tone Burst Stimuli in Individuals with Unilateral Hearing Loss
    Sordi Silva, Barbara Cristiane
    Bornia Jacob-Corteletti, Lilian Cassia
    da Silveira Sassi, Tyuana Sandim
    Chaves, Juliana Nogueira
    Araujo, Eliene Silva
    Alvarenga, Katia de Freitas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2021, 32 (04) : 254 - 260
  • [39] Comparison of auditory steady-state response and click-evoked auditory brain response in infants with different types and degrees of hearing loss
    Wang, Xiaoli
    Cheng, Yangyang
    Shi, Jing
    Sheng, Xiangyun
    Wu, Dan
    Zhao, Yali
    Li, Danhui
    He, Dinghua
    Wang, Hua
    [J]. ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2020, 140 (02) : 116 - 121
  • [40] Air and Bone Conduction Click and Tone-Burst Auditory Brainstem Thresholds Using Kalman Adaptive Processing in Nonsedated Normal-Hearing Infants
    Elsayed, Alaaeldin M.
    Hunter, Lisa L.
    Keefe, Douglas H.
    Feeney, M. Patrick
    Brown, David K.
    Meinzen-Derr, Jareen K.
    Baroch, Kelly
    Sullivan-Mahoney, Maureen
    Francis, Kara
    Schaid, Leigh G.
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2015, 36 (04) : 471 - 481