US Grower Views on Problematic Weeds and Changes in Weed Pressure in Glyphosate-Resistant Corn, Cotton, and Soybean Cropping Systems

被引:59
作者
Kruger, Greg R.
Johnson, William G. [1 ]
Weller, Stephen C.
Owen, Micheal D. K.
Shaw, David R.
Wilcut, John W.
Jordan, David L.
Wilson, Robert G.
Bernards, Mark L.
Young, Bryan G.
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
Crop rotation; glyphosate-resistant crops; glyphosate-resistant weeds; survey; weed shifts; FARMER PERCEPTIONS; MANAGEMENT; ROTATION;
D O I
10.1614/WT-08-040.1
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Corn and soybean growers in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, and North Carolina, as well as cotton growers in Mississippi and North Carolina, were surveyed about their views on changes in problematic weeds and weed pressure in cropping systems based on a glyphosate-resistant (GR) crop. No growers using a GR cropping system for more than 5 yr reported heavy weed pressure. Over all cropping systems investigated (continuous GR soybean, continuous GR cotton, GR corn/GR soybean, GR soybean/non-GR crop, and GR corn/non-GR crop), 0 to 7% of survey respondents reported greater weed pressure after implementing rotations using GR crops, whereas 31 to 57% felt weed pressure was similar and 36 to 70% indicated that weed pressure was less. Pigweed, morningglory, johnsongrass, ragweed, foxtail, and velvetleaf were mentioned as their most problematic weeds, depending on the state and cropping system. Systems using GR crops improved weed management compared with the technologies used before the adoption of GR crops. However, the long-term success of managing problematic weeds in GR cropping systems will require the development of multifaceted integrated weed management programs that include glyphosate as well as other weed management tactics.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 166
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] BARBERI P, 1998, WEED TECHNOL, V12, P531
  • [2] Barnes J., 2004, CROP MANAGEMENT, DOI [DOI 10.1094/CM-2004-0923-02-BR, 10.1094/CM-2004-0923-02-BR]
  • [3] Cardina J, 2002, WEED SCI, V50, P448, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0448:CRATSE]2.0.CO
  • [4] 2
  • [5] Clay PA, 2000, WEED SCI, V48, P481, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0481:WSPASE]2.0.CO
  • [6] 2
  • [7] Glyphosate-induced weed shifts
    Culpepper, A. Stanley
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 20 (02) : 277 - 281
  • [8] Culpepper AS, 2001, WEED TECHNOL, V15, P56, DOI 10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0056:MISALC]2.0.CO
  • [9] 2
  • [10] DIFFERENTIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF FIELD BINDWEED (CONVOLVULUS-ARVENSIS) BIOTYPES TO GLYPHOSATE
    DEGENNARO, FP
    WELLER, SC
    [J]. WEED SCIENCE, 1984, 32 (04) : 472 - 476