Deadline division-based heuristic for cost optimization in workflow scheduling

被引:92
作者
Yuan, Yingchun [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiaoping [1 ,3 ]
Wang, Qian [1 ,3 ]
Zhu, Xia [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
[2] Agr Univ Hebei, Fac Informat Sci & Technol, Baoding 071001, Peoples R China
[3] Southeast Univ, Key Lab Comp Network & Informat Integrat, Minist Educ, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划);
关键词
Grid computing; Workflow; Directed acyclic graph; Cost/time tradeoff; Heuristic; COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMY; TRADEOFF PROBLEM; QOS; SERVICE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2009.01.035
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Cost optimization for workflow applications described by Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) with deadline constraints is a fundamental and intractable problem on Grids. In this paper, an effective and efficient heuristic called DET (Deadline Early Tree) is proposed. An early feasible schedule for a workflow application is defined as an Early Tree. According to the Early Tree, all tasks are grouped and the Critical Path is given. For critical activities, the optimal cost solution under the deadline constraint can be obtained by a dynamic programming strategy, and the whole deadline is segmented into time windows according to the slack time float. For non-critical activities, an iterative procedure is proposed to maximize time windows while maintaining the precedence constraints among activities. In terms of the time window allocations, a local optimization method is developed to minimize execution costs. The two local cost optimization methods can lead to a global near-optimal solution. Experimental results show that DET outperforms two other recent leveling algorithms. Moreover, the deadline division strategy adopted by DET can be applied to all feasible deadlines. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2562 / 2575
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   A computational economy for grid computing and its implementation in the Nimrod-G resource broker [J].
Abramson, D ;
Buyya, R ;
Giddy, J .
FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2002, 18 (08) :1061-1074
[2]   Network decomposition-based benchmark results for the discrete time-cost tradeoff problem [J].
Akkan, C ;
Drexl, A ;
Kimms, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2005, 165 (02) :339-358
[3]   An approach for quality of service adaptation in service-oriented Grids [J].
Al-Ali, R ;
Hafid, A ;
Rana, O ;
Walker, D .
CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2004, 16 (05) :401-412
[4]  
Al-Ali RJ, 2002, COMPUT INFORM, V21, P363
[5]  
[Anonymous], P 10 IEE HET COMP WO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Journal of Grid Computing, DOI [10.1023/a:1024000426962, 10.1023/A:1024000426962, DOI 10.1023/A:1024000426962]
[7]  
Blythe J, 2005, 2005 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CLUSTER COMPUTING AND THE GRID, VOLS 1 AND 2, P759
[8]   Economic models for resource management and scheduling in Grid computing [J].
Buyya, R ;
Abramson, D ;
Giddy, J ;
Stockinger, H .
CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2002, 14 (13-15) :1507-1542
[9]  
Cooper K., 2004, Proceedings. 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium
[10]   Complexity of the discrete time-cost tradeoff problem for project networks [J].
De, P ;
Dunne, EJ ;
Ghosh, JB ;
Wells, CE .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1997, 45 (02) :302-306