Maximum magnitude earthquakes induced by fluid injection

被引:546
作者
McGarr, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
关键词
induced earthquakes; fluid injection; seismic moment; earthquake magnitude; wastewater disposal; enhanced geothermal systems; COGDELL OIL-FIELD; INDUCED SEISMICITY; DENVER EARTHQUAKES; 2-YEAR SURVEY; SEQUENCE; RESERVOIR; VALLEY; SHALE; OHIO;
D O I
10.1002/2013JB010597
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Analysis of numerous case histories of earthquake sequences induced by fluid injection at depth reveals that the maximum magnitude appears to be limited according to the total volume of fluid injected. Similarly, the maximum seismic moment seems to have an upper bound proportional to the total volume of injected fluid. Activities involving fluid injection include (1) hydraulic fracturing of shale formations or coal seams to extract gas and oil, (2) disposal of wastewater from these gas and oil activities by injection into deep aquifers, and (3) the development of enhanced geothermal systems by injecting water into hot, low-permeability rock. Of these three operations, wastewater disposal is observed to be associated with the largest earthquakes, with maximum magnitudes sometimes exceeding 5. To estimate the maximum earthquake that could be induced by a given fluid injection project, the rock mass is assumed to be fully saturated, brittle, to respond to injection with a sequence of earthquakes localized to the region weakened by the pore pressure increase of the injection operation and to have a Gutenberg-Richter magnitude distribution with a b value of 1. If these assumptions correctly describe the circumstances of the largest earthquake, then the maximum seismic moment is limited to the volume of injected liquid times the modulus of rigidity. Observations from the available case histories of earthquakes induced by fluid injection are consistent with this bound on seismic moment. In view of the uncertainties in this analysis, however, this should not be regarded as an absolute physical limit.
引用
收藏
页码:1008 / 1019
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Earthquake source scaling relationships from -1 to 5 M(L) using seismograms recorded at 2.5-km depth [J].
Abercrombie, RE .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1995, 100 (B12) :24015-24036
[2]   Deep-injection and closely monitored induced seismicity at Paradox Valley, Colorado [J].
Ake, J ;
Mahrer, K ;
O'Connell, D ;
Block, L .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 95 (02) :664-683
[3]   Monitoring of induced seismicity during the first geothermal reservoir stimulation at Paralana, Australia [J].
Albaric, J. ;
Oye, V. ;
Langet, N. ;
Hasting, M. ;
Lecomte, I. ;
Iranpour, K. ;
Messeiller, M. ;
Reid, P. .
GEOTHERMICS, 2014, 52 :120-131
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, 020073 US GEOL SURV
[5]   Induced seismicity during the stimulation of a geothermal HFR reservoir in the Cooper Basin, Australia [J].
Baisch, Stefan ;
Weidler, Ralph ;
Voros, Robert ;
Wyborn, Doone ;
de Graaf, Lambertus .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2006, 96 (06) :2242-2256
[6]  
BC Oil and Gas Commission, 2012, INV OBS SEISM HORN R
[7]   On the Rupture Process of the 23 August 2011 Virginia Earthquake [J].
Chapman, M. C. .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2013, 103 (2A) :613-628
[8]  
DAVIS SD, 1989, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V79, P1477
[9]  
De Pater C., 2011, GEOMECHANICAL STUDY
[10]   Injection-Induced Earthquakes [J].
Ellsworth, William L. .
SCIENCE, 2013, 341 (6142) :142-+