Strategies of Integration in Mixed Methods Research: Insights Using Relational Algorithms

被引:26
作者
Tunarosa, Andrea [1 ]
Glynn, Mary Ann [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Coll, Carroll Sch Management, 140 Commonwealth Ave, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 USA
关键词
mixed methods; integration; theory; QUANTITATIVE METHODS; IDENTITY; LEGITIMACY; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; ORGANIZATIONS; CONSTRUCTION; ORIENTATION; PERFORMANCE; SENSEMAKING; CATEGORIES;
D O I
10.1177/1094428116637197
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The challenge of integration, namely, the bridging across different intellectual paradigms to combine empirical insights into a coherent and plausible explanation, is endemic to mixed methods research. In this article, we address this challenge in two ways: first, by drawing attention to the role that theoretical integration plays in mixed methods research as a complement to empirical integration and second, by broadening the repertoire of strategies for enhancing the interplay of theoretical and empirical elements in a mixed methods study. We use the technique of relational algorithms, a linguistic exercise designed to produce novel relations between pairs of things by experimenting with different words that can connect theory and empirics. We propose that connector words (e.g., along, near, within) can forge linkages between quantitative and qualitative methods that extend the simple coupling implied by and. We advance five strategies of integration, two that are commonly used in management researchconjoined and sequentialand three high-potential but relatively underused strategiessimultaneous, full-cycle, and mono-logic. We illustrate each of these with examples from the management and organizational literature.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 242
页数:19
相关论文
共 74 条
[51]   Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market [J].
Rosa, JA ;
Porac, JF ;
Runser-Spanjol, J ;
Saxon, MS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1999, 63 :64-77
[52]   Building better theory by bridging the quantitative-qualitative divide [J].
Shah, Sonali K. ;
Corley, Kevin G. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2006, 43 (08) :1821-1835
[53]   How to Conduct a Mixed Methods Study: Recent Trends in a Rapidly Growing Literature [J].
Small, Mario Luis .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, VOL 37, 2011, 37 :57-86
[54]  
SMITH KG, 1985, ACAD MANAGE J, V28, P799, DOI 10.5465/256238
[55]   IT'S NOT EASY BEING GREEN: THE ROLE OF SELF-EVALUATIONS IN EXPLAINING SUPPORT OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES [J].
Sonenshein, Scott ;
DeCelles, Katherine A. ;
Dutton, Jane E. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 57 (01) :7-37
[56]   TOWARD INTEGRATING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS - AN INTRODUCTION [J].
STECKLER, A ;
MCLEROY, KR ;
GOODMAN, RM ;
BIRD, ST ;
MCCORMICK, L .
HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 1992, 19 (01) :1-8
[57]   WHAT THEORY IS NOT [J].
SUTTON, RI ;
STAW, BM .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1995, 40 (03) :371-384
[58]  
SUTTON RI, 1988, ACAD MANAGE J, V31, P461, DOI 10.5465/256456
[59]   The virtues of closet qualitative research [J].
Sutton, RI .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1997, 8 (01) :97-106
[60]  
Tashakkori A., 2003, Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavorial research, P671, DOI [DOI 10.4135/9781506335193, 10.4135/9781506335193]