From indirect aggression to invisible aggression: A conceptual view on bullying and peer group manipulation

被引:117
作者
Garandeau, Claire F.
Cillessen, Antonius H. N.
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Psychol, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Univ Paris 05, Dept Psychol, F-75270 Paris 06, France
关键词
peer relations; victimization; indirect aggression; social influence; group processes;
D O I
10.1016/j.avb.2005.08.005
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Recent research has emphasized the importance of indirect aggression among children and has challenged the conception that aggressive children lack social-cognitive skills. In schools, victimization against non-provocative targets rarely involves just a dyad, but might not be simply the product of group processes either. This paper suggests that in most cases it results from the encounter between a skillful bully and a group that lacks true cohesiveness, through a process of normative social influence. Groups with low quality of friendships may be more likely than others to become instruments of aggression as victimization provides them with a common goal and an appearance of cohesion. We hypothesize that, in some cases, the manipulation of a healthy-functioning group is also possible but requires use of particularly subtle devices, and thus a higher level of social intelligence by the bully. We also suggest that in such a situation the aggressive act is not just indirect, but invisible and the influence exerted on the group might be informational and not normative. Implications for the characteristics of the victim and suggestions for future research are discussed. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:612 / 625
页数:14
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]   DYNAMICS OF INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION IN PREADOLESCENT CLIQUES [J].
ADLER, PA ;
ADLER, P .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1995, 58 (03) :145-162
[2]  
Alsaker F. D., 1993, ENFANCE, V46, P241, DOI DOI 10.3406/ENFAN.1993.2060
[3]  
Alsaker FD, 2001, PEER HARASSMENT IN SCHOOL, P175
[4]  
[Anonymous], J FORT LOGAN MENTAL
[5]  
[Anonymous], GROUP PROCESS INTERG, DOI DOI 10.1177/1368430299022005
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, BULLYING SCH WHAT DO
[7]   STUDIES OF INDEPENDENCE AND CONFORMITY .1. A MINORITY OF ONE AGAINST A UNANIMOUS MAJORITY [J].
ASCH, SE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1956, 70 (09) :1-70
[8]   IDENTIFYING CHILDREN WHO ARE REJECTED BY THEIR PEERS [J].
ASHER, SR ;
DODGE, KA .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 22 (04) :444-449
[9]   The best friendships of aggressive boys: Relationship quality, conflict management, and rule-breaking behavior [J].
Bagwell, CL ;
Coie, JD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 88 (01) :5-24
[10]  
BAUDIER A, 2002, DEV AFFECTIF SOCIAL