Comparison of orthodontic and orthopedic effects of a modified maxillary protractor between deciduous and early mixed dentitions

被引:52
作者
Kajiyama, K [1 ]
Murakami, T [1 ]
Suzuki, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.04.014
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the maxillary protractor bow appliance (MPBA) on dentoalveolar structure and skeletal morphology in patients with Class III malocclusions in different dental stages. The sample consisted of 63 treated and 57 untreated Japanese patients who all had anterior crossbites. The former group was treated with MPBA and included 34 subjects with deciduous dentition (DT group) and 29 subjects with early mixed dentition (MT group). In the DT group, MPBA was used over a mean period of 5 months to obtain positive overjet, and, in the MT group, MPBA was used over a mean period of 10 months identically. Analysis of variance with 3 factors (appliance, treatment stage, sex) between treated and untreated subjects and unpaired t tests between DT and MT groups were performed from 2 lateral cephalograms before and after treatment to compare the dentofacial changes. The mechanisms of improving anterior crossbite were similar in both groups; however, the mean skeletal and dentoalveolar changes in the DT group were significantly greater than those in the MT group. The clinical effects of MPBA treatment were greater in the deciduous-dentition group than in the early-mixed-dentition group.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 32
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]  
Delaire J, 1971, Trans Eur Orthod Soc, P81
[12]  
Filho OGS, 1998, AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC, V113, P196
[13]   Treatment effects of simple fixed appliance and reverse headgear in correction of anterior crossbites [J].
Gu, Y ;
Rabie, ABM ;
Hägg, U .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2000, 117 (06) :691-699
[14]  
Hellman M., 1932, Int J Orthod, V18, P777, DOI 10.1016/S0099-6963(32)90114-8
[15]   TREATMENT EFFECT OF COMBINED MAXILLARY PROTRACTION AND CHINCAP APPLIANCE IN SEVERE SKELETAL CLASS-III CASES [J].
ISHII, H ;
MORITA, S ;
TAKEUCHI, Y ;
NAKAMURA, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1987, 92 (04) :304-312
[16]   PHOTOELASTIC EFFECTS OF MAXILLARY PROTRACTION ON THE CRANIOFACIAL COMPLEX [J].
ITOH, T ;
CHACONAS, SJ ;
CAPUTO, AA ;
MATYAS, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1985, 88 (02) :117-124
[17]   EXPERIMENTAL AND POST-EXPERIMENTAL RESPONSE TO ANTERIORLY DIRECTED EXTRA-ORAL FORCE IN YOUNG MACACA NEMESTRINA [J].
JACKSON, GW ;
KOKICH, VG ;
SHAPIRO, PA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1979, 75 (03) :318-333
[18]   Evaluation of the modified maxillary protractor applied to Class III malocclusion with retruded maxilla in early mixed dentition [J].
Kajiyama, K ;
Murakami, T ;
Suzuki, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2000, 118 (05) :549-559
[19]   DENTOFACIAL CHANGES PRODUCED BY EXTRAORAL FORWARD FORCE IN MACACA IRUS [J].
KAMBARA, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1977, 71 (03) :249-277
[20]   Cephalometric effects of face mask expansion therapy in Class III children: A comparison of three age groups [J].
Kapust, AJ ;
Sinclair, PM ;
Turley, PK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1998, 113 (02) :204-212