Comparison of orthodontic and orthopedic effects of a modified maxillary protractor between deciduous and early mixed dentitions

被引:52
作者
Kajiyama, K [1 ]
Murakami, T [1 ]
Suzuki, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.04.014
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the maxillary protractor bow appliance (MPBA) on dentoalveolar structure and skeletal morphology in patients with Class III malocclusions in different dental stages. The sample consisted of 63 treated and 57 untreated Japanese patients who all had anterior crossbites. The former group was treated with MPBA and included 34 subjects with deciduous dentition (DT group) and 29 subjects with early mixed dentition (MT group). In the DT group, MPBA was used over a mean period of 5 months to obtain positive overjet, and, in the MT group, MPBA was used over a mean period of 10 months identically. Analysis of variance with 3 factors (appliance, treatment stage, sex) between treated and untreated subjects and unpaired t tests between DT and MT groups were performed from 2 lateral cephalograms before and after treatment to compare the dentofacial changes. The mechanisms of improving anterior crossbite were similar in both groups; however, the mean skeletal and dentoalveolar changes in the DT group were significantly greater than those in the MT group. The clinical effects of MPBA treatment were greater in the deciduous-dentition group than in the early-mixed-dentition group.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 32
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   The effects of a modified protraction headgear on maxilla [J].
Alcan, T ;
Keles, A ;
Erverdi, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2000, 117 (01) :27-38
[2]   Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy [J].
Baccetti, T ;
McGill, JS ;
Franchi, L ;
McNamara, JA ;
Tollaro, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1998, 113 (03) :333-343
[3]   Treatment and posttreatment craniofacial changes after vapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy [J].
Baccetti, T ;
Franchi, L ;
McNamara, JA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2000, 118 (04) :404-413
[5]   A comparative study of the effects of customized facemask therapy or headgear to the lower arch on the developing Class III face [J].
Battagel, JM ;
Orton, HS .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1995, 17 (06) :467-482
[6]  
Chong YH, 1996, ANGLE ORTHOD, V66, P351
[7]   GROWTH AND CLASS 2 TREATMENT [J].
COBEN, SE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1966, 52 (01) :5-&
[8]   EXTRA-ORAL TRACTION AND CLASS-III TREATMENT [J].
COZZANI, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1981, 80 (06) :638-650
[9]  
Deguchi T, 1999, ANGLE ORTHOD, V69, P349
[10]   Long-term application of chincup force alters the morphology of the dolichofacial Class III mandible [J].
Deguchi, T ;
Kuroda, T ;
Hunt, NP ;
Graber, TM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1999, 116 (06) :610-615