Barriers to improving energy efficiency in short sea shipping: an action research case study

被引:81
作者
Johnson, Hannes [1 ]
Johansson, Mikael [2 ]
Andersson, Karin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Shipping & Marine Technol, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] DNV Advisory Serv, SE-41104 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Energy efficiency gap; Energy management; Short sea shipping; Ship energy efficiency management plan; Action research; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; SCIENCE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.046
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Increased energy efficiency will be paramount in mitigating CO2 emissions from shipping. Paradoxically, previous research has shown that a substantial amount of measures that typically increase energy efficiency, should be cost-efficient to implement. This is often explained in literature in terms of barriers in markets, institutions and organizations. This article is the first of a series of articles from a joint industry project aiming at understanding good energy management practices in shipping companies. It explores barriers to energy efficiency in shipping through a case study of a short sea shipping company in their process to implement an energy management system. An action research design was chosen to contribute to better practice as well as knowledge in the research community. The study shows that work with energy efficiency was not straightforward, and several challenge areas could be discerned: project management capabilities, ship-shore communication, division of responsibilities, access to performance measurements, and competence in energy efficiency. It is proposed that interpretative research methodologies such as action research could contribute to new perspectives on the traditional barrier discourse. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 327
页数:11
相关论文
共 72 条
[11]  
Collingridge D, 1986, SCI SPEAKS POWER ROL
[12]   Action research for operations management [J].
Coughlan, P ;
Coghlan, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2002, 22 (02) :220-240
[13]  
de T'Serclaes P., 2007, Mind the Gap: Quantifying Principal Agent Problems in Energy Efficiency
[14]   MEASUREMENT OF SHIP PERFORMANCE [J].
DRINKWATER, JW .
JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1967, 44 (09) :702-+
[15]   Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research [J].
Dubois, A ;
Gadde, LE .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2002, 55 (07) :553-560
[16]  
EC, 2011, WHITE PAPER ROADM SI
[17]  
Eden C., 1996, J MANAGE, V7, P75, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-8551.1996.TB00107.X
[18]   Future cost scenarios for reduction of ship CO2 emissions [J].
Eide, Magnus S. ;
Longva, Tore ;
Hoffmann, Peter ;
Endresen, Oyvind ;
Dalsoren, Stig B. .
MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2011, 38 (01) :11-37
[19]   BUILDING THEORIES FROM CASE-STUDY RESEARCH [J].
EISENHARDT, KM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (04) :532-550
[20]  
Faber J., 2009, TECHNICAL SUPPORT EU