Building Administrative Capacity for the Age of Rapid Globalization: A Modest Prescription for the Twenty-First Century

被引:97
作者
Farazmand, Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida Atlantic Univ, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
关键词
CRISIS; CHAOS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02054.x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The twenty-first century is characterized by rapid change, globalization, hyper-competition, and hyper-uncertainty. Traditional models of governance and public administration are no match for the challenges of this chaotic environment. This essay argues for building new administrative capacity in response to these serious governance dilemmas. Offered as a modest prescription, this new administrative capacity is proposed to cope more effectively with an increasingly unknowable world. The article opens with an overview of key issues, then focuses directly on the nature and trends of global public sector changes, and concludes by elaborating on the building of such administrative capacity. The author's proposals are presented from a macro perspective: first, suggestions for revitalizing public service and administration given the current crisis; second, macro strategies for enhancing capacity design; and third, specific reforms for strengthening governance, instrumental and administrative capacities, along with concrete recommendations for public administration.
引用
收藏
页码:1007 / 1020
页数:14
相关论文
共 130 条
[1]  
Agnew John., 2005, Hegemony: The new shape of global power
[2]   Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers [J].
Agranoff, Robert .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2006, 66 :56-65
[3]  
Amsden Alice., 2007, ESCAPE EMPIRE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, MANAGEMENT CHALLENGE
[5]  
[Anonymous], COPING CRISES GOVT D
[6]  
[Anonymous], EC GEOGRAPHY
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1990, The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization
[8]  
[Anonymous], MULTINATIONAL MANAGE
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2005, The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century
[10]  
[Anonymous], C SCHMITTS CRITIQUE